Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Cim v. Wuddelhoff
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Cim v. Wuddelhoff
    COI 5 gen: 1.953%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Bautz v. d. Leda and Dam Andra v. Wuddelhoff
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 7.031%    low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)57
    Ancestor Loss5
    Ancestor Loss in %91.94 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Bautz v. d. Leda50.00011
    Andra v. Wuddelhoff50.00011
    Gitta v. Lossetal25.00011
    Esko v. Huntetal25.00011
    Britt Aus Grupilinga25.00011
    Graf v. Silbersee25.00011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein18.740312
    Flocke v. d. Tränke18.740312
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp12.50011
    Laika v. d. Waterkant12.50011
    Chico v. Borgkamp12.50011
    Boss v. Silbersee12.50011
    Dolly v. Lossetal12.50011
    Esta v. Ruthenstrom12.50011
    Natter v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Britta v. Lossetal6.25011
    Citta v. Langen Siek6.25011
    Bob v. d. Schlei6.25011
    Esko Vun'N Wischhoff6.25011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg6.25011
    Cita v. d. Tränke6.25011
    Xari v. Wolfsgrund6.25011
    Elvi v. Lossetal6.25011
    Bodo v. Weserstrand6.25011
    Ines v. d. Waterkant6.25011
    Cent Graf v. Amelsbüren6.25011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen6.25011
    Alin v. Ruthenstrom6.25011
    Ino v. Kreyenhorst6.25011
    Groll v. Reutherspfad6.25011
    Ajax v. Klockhof6.24022
    Wido v. Schwege3.12011
    Arno v. Karlshof3.12011
    Anka v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Sonja v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Argo v. Bergwinkel3.12011
    Assi v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Olli v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Diva v. d. Uhrau3.12011
    Ingo v. Schadwalde3.12011
    Fenna v. Kreyenhorst3.12011
    Cilly v. Waterkant3.12011
    Alic v. Basbek3.12011
    Birko v. Holsatia3.12011
    Freifrau v. d. Overbecker Mühle3.12011
    Cora v. Tannenkamp3.12011
    Biene v. Ringofen3.12011
    Arco v. Reutherspfad3.12011
    Heidi v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Rasso v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Alf v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Grandt v. d. Uhrau3.12011
    Zent v. Feuersang3.12011
    Ysa v. Rudenhay3.12011
    Donar v. Alten Zollhaus3.12011
    Anke v. Birkenhof3.12011
    Arrak v. Hagenpolder3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s