Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Aida
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Aida
    COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Ajax v. Störenhaus and Dam Akita
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 1.074%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)60
    Ancestor Loss2
    Ancestor Loss in %96.77 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Ajax v. Störenhaus50.00011
    Akita50.00011
    Olle v. Fährhaus25.00011
    Stasi De Wynen25.00011
    Heido v. Wiken25.00011
    King v. Fährhaus25.00011
    Amsel v. d. Leda12.50011
    Groll Holsatia12.50011
    Jenny De Wynen12.50011
    Benn v. Moorkamp12.50011
    Kreon De Wynen12.50011
    Basko v. Neuenhof12.50011
    Gila v. Wiken12.50011
    Adda v. Wetternwege12.50011
    Whisky v. Schwege9.370211
    Dina v. Steinroden9.370211
    Xandra v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Darex Z Plotmylku6.25011
    Enno Holsatia6.25011
    Hazel De Wynen6.25011
    Dina v. d. Sandhöhen6.25011
    Fango v. Waterkant6.25011
    Immo v. d. Binnenelbe6.25011
    Afra v. Huttfleth6.25011
    Boro v. Silbersee6.25011
    Britta v. Fährhaus6.25011
    Groll v. Reutherspfad6.25011
    Anka v. Duewelsknapp6.25011
    Delta v. Langen Siek6.25011
    Kuno v. Grünbachtal6.25011
    Cuno v. Thülenhorst3.12011
    Ino v. Kreyenhorst3.12011
    Morro v. Feuersang3.12011
    Gina Dankwarder Ode3.12011
    Bandit v. Grünbachtal3.12011
    Quarz v. Schwege3.12011
    Anka v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Mary v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Cäsar v. d Holzheide3.12011
    Quinti v. Schwege3.12011
    Assi v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Dolf v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Citta v. Langen Siek3.12011
    Astor v. Rothen Hahn3.12011
    Arco v. Reutherspfad3.12011
    Cilly v. Waterkant3.12011
    Ir Z Jiv3.12011
    Iras v. Odisheim3.12011
    Lore v. Fleestedt3.12011
    Minka v. Hulshof3.12011
    Heidi v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Donna v. Schäftlarn3.12011
    Asso v. Stubben3.12011
    Ara Z Dianina Udoli3.12011
    Alan Z Serikoveho Kraje3.12011
    Tasso v. Feuersang3.12011
    Ester v. Wendland3.12011
    Flora v. Settel3.12011
    Birko v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Fanny De Wynen3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s