Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Fleurtje v. d. Westkerkseberg
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Fleurtje v. d. Westkerkseberg
    COI 5 gen: 0.586%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Hannes v. Kiekenbruch and Dam Silke v. d. Westkerkseberg
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)57
    Ancestor Loss5
    Ancestor Loss in %91.94 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Silke v. d. Westkerkseberg50.00011
    Hannes v. Kiekenbruch50.00011
    Gero v. Alt-Hümmling25.00011
    Milo van Mosmalen25.00011
    Clara v. Kiekenbruch25.00011
    Kitty v. d. Westkerkseberg25.00011
    Andras v. d. Loksche Ackers12.50011
    Caj v. Alt-Hümmling12.50011
    Greif v. Reitbach12.50011
    Cindy v. h. Loodtserf12.50011
    Yda v. d. Binnenelbe12.50011
    Cita v. Hollbäck12.50011
    Donar v. Mosmalen12.50011
    Cayla v. d. Oude Ijssel12.50011
    Coach v. Ziegelweiher6.25011
    Rika v. Linduri6.25011
    Buchi V. Mosmalen (Gen for gul pelsfave)6.25011
    Arras v. Eschbach6.25011
    Aischa v. Heek6.25011
    Jovi v. d. Liniedijk6.25011
    Samson v. Linduri6.25011
    Jade v. Forst Ostenwalde6.25011
    Verandi v. h. Mezennestje6.25011
    Duko Fan'E Swadde6.25011
    Elza v. d. Duyl6.25011
    Graf v. Linebrok6.25011
    Aska v. Forstkamp6.25011
    Gabi v.d. Röthaller6.25011
    Castor v. d. Hirtenburg6.25011
    Asko v. Heek6.25011
    Bautz v. d. Leda6.24022
    Igor v. Linebrok6.24022
    Asta v. Averbeck6.24022
    Cina v. d. Röthaller3.12011
    Meika v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Vici v. d. Liniedijk3.12011
    Hesta v. Linduri3.12011
    Cita v. Forst Ostenwalde3.12011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund3.12011
    Horrik v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Caprice du Buisson de Choisel (Gen for gul pelsfarve)3.12011
    Tina v. d. Bilsbek3.12011
    Aron v. Averbeck3.12011
    Sieta3.12011
    Gina v. Roonstein3.12011
    Tessa v. d. Koolveenhof3.12011
    Hella v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Bruno v. d. Hoogpalse Akkers3.12011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Arras v. Eikenloh3.12011
    Westfalen's Birka3.12011
    Sally v. d. Duyl3.12011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Mirco v. Linduri3.12011
    Artos v. d. Schirmkiefer3.12011
    Igor v. d. Monnikenberg3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s