Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Cayla v. d. Oude Ijssel
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Cayla v. d. Oude Ijssel
    COI 5 gen: 1.172%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Asko v. Heek and Dam Jade v. Forst Ostenwalde
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 1.074%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)59
    Ancestor Loss3
    Ancestor Loss in %95.16 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Jade v. Forst Ostenwalde50.00011
    Asko v. Heek50.00011
    Igor v. Linebrok25.00011
    Cita v. Forst Ostenwalde25.00011
    Asta v. Averbeck25.00011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga25.00011
    Certa v. Hülsebusch12.50011
    Elfe v. Linebrok12.50011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde12.50011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern12.50011
    Solojäger's Laura12.50011
    Lord v. Jurawald12.50011
    Archibald v. d. Segeberger Heide12.50011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg12.50011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga9.370211
    Bautz v. d. Leda9.370211
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof9.370211
    Olga v. d. Drachheide6.25011
    Nixe v. d. Holzheide6.25011
    Alice v. Wiebusch6.25011
    Gwenda v. Jurawald6.25011
    Hella v. Nörderkamp6.25011
    Jerome De Wynen6.25011
    Anka v. Schönrain6.25011
    Solojäger's Harras6.25011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Axel v. d. Lechmündung6.25011
    Cim v. Wuddelhoff6.25011
    Gordon v. d. Hafkesdell6.25011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald6.25011
    Dixie v. Falkenhorst3.12011
    Daisy v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Cora v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Zick v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Bodo v. d. Kummel3.12011
    Cora v. Linebrok3.12011
    Filou v. Alten Hafen3.12011
    Laura v. Poppenforst3.12011
    Cindy v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Lara v. Werlacke3.12011
    Nimrod's Birko3.12011
    Puro v. d. Faistenau3.12011
    Fara v. Friedleinsgrund3.12011
    Dux v. Falkenhorst3.12011
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Elsa v. Burghöft3.12011
    Farah v. Minatal3.12011
    Graf v. Silbersee3.12011
    Basko v. Bucheneck3.12011
    Nadja De Wynen3.12011
    Andra v. Wuddelhoff3.12011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek3.12011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land3.12011
    Niklas De Wynen3.12011
    Solojäger's Distel3.12011
    Cora v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Yalk De Wynen3.12011
    Gitta v. Lossetal3.12011
    Groll v. Huntetal3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s