Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Gismo v. Bökenberg
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Gismo v. Bökenberg
    COI 5 gen: 1.953%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Ilk v. Wietensholt and Dam Vreni v. Bonrechtern
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 1.953%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)55
    Ancestor Loss7
    Ancestor Loss in %88.71 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Ilk v. Wietensholt50.00011
    Vreni v. Bonrechtern50.00011
    Westfalen's Don25.00011
    Hummel v. Wietensholt25.00011
    Asko v. d. Berkelaue25.00011
    Dixi v. Haltergrund25.00011
    Greif v. Reitbach15.620321
    Falko v. Forst Ostenwalde12.50022
    Fanny v. Wietensholt12.50011
    Hardy v. Heek12.50011
    Isabell v. Buchheim12.50011
    Vasko v. d. Hafkesdell12.50011
    Lena v. Heesenhof12.50011
    Pina v. Bonrechtern12.50011
    Anton v. Steinbachtal12.50011
    Kuno v. d. Horstbüschen12.50011
    Hanno v. Emsdeich6.25011
    Dark v. d. Himmerner Heide6.25011
    Leonie v. Alten Hafen6.25011
    Delta v. Lockfehn6.25011
    Westfalen's Cuno6.25011
    Anka v. Rothsee6.25011
    Suko v. d. Hafkesdell6.25011
    Aika v. Lewitzgrund6.25011
    Emmy v. d. Horstbüschen6.25011
    Dean v. d. Horstbüschen6.25011
    Asta v. Averbeck6.25011
    Cora v. Mittelrhein6.25011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz6.24022
    Arras v. d. Segeberger Heide6.24022
    Rika v. Linduri6.24022
    Arras v. Eschbach6.24022
    Linda v. Fasanenhof3.12011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Kastor v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Eddy v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Moni v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Rena v. Elbufer3.12011
    Amsel v. Hahnentange3.12011
    Gera v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Quell v. Huntetal3.12011
    Debby v. Emsdeich3.12011
    Kira v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Basko v. Tannengarten3.12011
    Anja v. Veybach3.12011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern3.12011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg3.12011
    Elch v. Rodekopp3.12011
    Don v. Forst Ostenwalde3.12011
    Cora v. Deutschen Orden3.12011
    Ilka v. Bonrechtern3.12011
    Preußen's Blitz3.12011
    Westfalen's Artus3.12011
    Bea v. d.Manningaburg3.12011
    Akko v. Loher Schwarten3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s