Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Diva v. Angerln
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Diva v. Angerln
    COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Gero v. Leefeld and Dam Cilli v. Angerln
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.586%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)59
    Ancestor Loss3
    Ancestor Loss in %95.16 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Gero v. Leefeld50.00011
    Cilli v. Angerln50.00011
    Faust v. d. Mainauen25.00011
    Conny v. Steinbachtal25.00011
    Bella v. Angerln25.00011
    Nena v. d. Werlacke25.00011
    Caj v. Alt-Hümmling12.50011
    Fella v. Neuenkämpen12.50011
    Hanno v. Emsdeich12.50011
    Xenia v. Wasserplatz12.50011
    Greif v. Reitbach12.50022
    Bara v.d. Mainauen12.50011
    Anka v. Rothsee12.50011
    Vyko v. Sämmenhof12.50011
    Arko v. Zaunmoos12.50011
    Bea v.d. Schorlemer'schen Rentei6.25011
    Aischa v. Heek6.25011
    Samson v. Linduri6.25011
    Centa v. Kirschenberg6.25011
    Debby v. Emsdeich6.25011
    Tessa v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Aron v. Averbeck6.25011
    Achill v.d. Krakequelle6.25011
    Nestor v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Elch v. Rodekopp6.25011
    Dina v. Neuenkämpen6.25011
    Cora v. Deutschen Orden6.25011
    Racker v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Xena v. Linduri6.25011
    Arras v. Eschbach6.24022
    Rika v. Linduri6.24022
    Hanno v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg3.12011
    Igor v. Perverberg3.12011
    Aloe v.d. Schorlemer'schen Rentei3.12011
    Perle v. Buchheim3.12011
    Dean v. d. Schmiede3.12011
    Denver v. d. Schmiede3.12011
    Heido v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Igor v. Linebrok3.12011
    Dixie v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Alexa v. Deutchen Orden3.12011
    Farah v. Hilkefeld3.12011
    Quell v. Huntetal3.12011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde3.12011
    Queen v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Anka v. Raddetal3.12011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern3.12011
    Senta v. Linduri3.12011
    Hesta v. Linduri3.12011
    Aika v. Rodekopp3.12011
    Gauner v. Stockey3.12011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Akira v. Birkengehege3.12011
    Hasko v. Linebrok3.12011
    Asta v. Averbeck3.12011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land3.12011
    Kascha v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Artus v. Elztal3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s