Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Chipsi z Horakova dvora
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Chipsi z Horakova dvora
    COI 5 gen: 2.148%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Basko v. Schlemminer Holz and Dam Alfa v. Dhrontal
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.586%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.586%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)57
    Ancestor Loss5
    Ancestor Loss in %91.94 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Basko v. Schlemminer Holz50.00011
    Alfa v. Dhrontal50.00011
    Xudo Nelha25.00011
    Neandertal's Amely25.00011
    Gemse v. Schlemminer Forst25.00011
    Kilgus v. Alten Hafen25.00011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga18.750211
    Anjuscha v. Schlemminer Forst12.50011
    Auguste v. Eulenspiegel12.50011
    Rauke Nelha12.50011
    Blue v. Mühbrooker Meer12.50011
    Crash v. Ziegelweiher12.50011
    Elkan v. Linebrok12.50011
    Westfalen's Cäsar12.50011
    Kira v. Tillplatz9.370211
    Solojäger's Laura9.370211
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde9.370211
    Bautz v. d. Leda6.25011
    Arko v. Deutschen Orden6.25011
    Isolde v. Alten Hafen6.25011
    Archibald v. d. Segeberger Heide6.25011
    Aron v. Averbeck6.25011
    Hella v. Nörderkamp6.25011
    Zuska v. Schlemminer Forst6.25011
    Westfalen's Birka6.25011
    Erle v. d. Segeberger Heide6.25011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land6.25011
    Jola Nelha6.25011
    Greif v. Reitbach6.25011
    Arco v. Backemeer6.24022
    Dax Nelha3.12011
    Lord v. Jurawald3.12011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Groll v. Huntetal3.12011
    Xorro De Wynen3.12011
    Arras v. Eschbach3.12011
    Dana v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Cim v. Wuddelhoff3.12011
    Fee v. Alten Hafen3.12011
    Cora v. Linebrok3.12011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide3.12011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Gauner v. Stockey3.12011
    Assel v. Jürgenstorf3.12011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern3.12011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg3.12011
    Distel v.d. Segeberger Heide3.12011
    Graf v. Silbersee3.12011
    Solojäger's Harras3.12011
    Gitta v. Buchheim3.12011
    Conrad v. Birkengehege3.12011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald3.12011
    Gitta v. Lossetal3.12011
    Rosa v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Rika v. Linduri3.12011
    Aika v. Buchwald3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s