Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Corda v. Schatzrain
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Corda v. Schatzrain
    COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Elch v. Jägerkreuz and Dam Alka v. Erlesberg
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.977%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)56
    Ancestor Loss6
    Ancestor Loss in %90.32 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Alka v. Erlesberg50.00011
    Elch v. Jägerkreuz50.00011
    Hecht v. d. Königseiche25.00011
    Flott Frankundfrei25.00011
    Anja v. Salinenblick25.00011
    Hella v. d. Lindenhöhe25.00011
    Hussa v. Rheinufer12.50011
    Achill v. Jagello12.50011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein12.50011
    Bill v. Bessingslust12.50011
    Grandel v. d. Lindenhöhe12.50011
    Gundi v. d. Königseiche12.50011
    Cora v. Lindenbauer12.50011
    Boss v. Silbersee12.50011
    Janko v. Waldsteinberg6.25011
    Natter v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Drauf v. d. Lindenhöhe6.25011
    Citta v. Langen Siek6.25011
    Blanka v. Holundereck6.25011
    Citta v. Arlsberg6.25011
    Ino v. Kreyenhorst6.25011
    Bodo v. Weserstrand6.25011
    Aran Z Manskeho Lesa6.25011
    Bill v. Straufhain6.25011
    Corda Frankundfrei6.25011
    Cäsar v. d. Hohen Geest6.25011
    Piter v. Feuersang6.25011
    Anka v. d. Vereinigung6.25011
    Cessie v. Holundereck6.25011
    Bianka v. d. Königseiche6.25011
    York Frankundfrei3.12011
    Alpha v. Waldfrieden3.12011
    Alf v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Arko v. Fischerwinkel3.12011
    Arko v. d. Falloh3.12011
    Amsel v. Windenhof3.12011
    Donar v. Alten Zollhaus3.12011
    Diva v. d. Uhrau3.12011
    Asti v. Windenhof3.12011
    Arno v. Karlshof3.12011
    Fenna v. Kreyenhorst3.12011
    Zent v. Feuersang3.12011
    Cora v. Waldsteinberg3.12011
    Cora v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Anka v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Chisko Jenno Graf v. Amelsbüren3.12011
    Axel v. Teufelsloch3.12011
    Ulla Frankundfrei3.12011
    Assi v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Whisky v. Schwege3.12011
    Illa v. Feuersang3.12011
    Boris v. Feuersang3.12011
    Falk v. Waldsteinberg3.12011
    Imme v. Feuersang3.12011
    Dingo v. Spitzberg3.12011
    Lord v. Lönsstein3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s