Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Hasko v. d. Laarsche Velden
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Hasko v. d. Laarsche Velden
    COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Bullenbarger's Asko and Dam Noetzie de la Vallee Du Multru
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 1.562%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)62
    Ancestor Loss0
    Ancestor Loss in %100.00 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Bullenbarger's Asko50.00011
    Noetzie de la Vallee Du Multru50.00011
    Grips v. Rodekopp25.00011
    Hanni v. Fliethbachtal25.00011
    Hardy v. Heek25.00011
    Loïs v. d. Laarsche Velden25.00011
    Basco v. Matzental12.50011
    Elsbeth v. Rodekopp12.50011
    Greif v. Reitbach12.50011
    Vidar v. d. Hafkesdell12.50011
    Ando v. Hollbäck12.50011
    Asta v. Averbeck12.50011
    Fee v. Fliethbachtal12.50011
    Brit Uit de Lange Jammer12.50011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern6.25011
    Wodan v. h. Westervlier6.25011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg6.25011
    Basko v. Alt-Hümmling6.25011
    Aloeke Loeke v. d. Berkenven6.25011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land6.25011
    Aika v. Rodekopp6.25011
    Asta v. Pamesgrub6.25011
    Rika v. Linduri6.25011
    Arras v. Eschbach6.25011
    Suko v. d. Hafkesdell6.25011
    Aska v. Forstkamp6.25011
    Dascha v. Fliethbachtal6.25011
    Orka v. d. Drachheide6.25011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Falko v. Forst Ostenwalde6.25011
    Tanja De Wynen3.12011
    Arras v. Eikenloh3.12011
    Meika v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Cord v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Aika v. Buchwald3.12011
    Elsa v. Burghöft3.12011
    Solojäger's Laura3.12011
    Bessy v. Ahnherrn3.12011
    Lotte v. d. Westervlier3.12011
    Bautz v. d. Leda3.12011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Falco-Basco Van'T Faan3.12011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde3.12011
    Anka v. Schönrain3.12011
    Karlo v. Linebrok3.12011
    Euro v. Blumenhof3.12011
    Mirza v. d. Bruine Hoeve3.12011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Gordon v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Aischa v. Heek3.12011
    Aury v. Waidbosch3.12011
    Gera v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Sultan v. d. Königseiche3.12011
    Westfalen's Artus3.12011
    Benja v. Fliethbachtal3.12011
    Arras v. d. Segeberger Heide3.12011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund3.12011
    Alice v. Wiebusch3.12011
    Gina v. Roonstein3.12011
    Artos v. d. Schirmkiefer3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s