Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Bella v. Fredenna
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Bella v. Fredenna
    COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Merlin v. Heesenhof and Dam Zita ll v. Lönsstein
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 1.367%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)59
    Ancestor Loss3
    Ancestor Loss in %95.16 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Merlin v. Heesenhof50.00011
    Zita ll v. Lönsstein50.00011
    Charly v. Waldvierteler Forst25.00011
    Vera ll v. Lönsstein25.00011
    Anton v. Kirchhof25.00011
    Bella v. d. Röttenkath25.00011
    Kaja v. Heesenhof12.50011
    Hanno v. Emsdeich12.50011
    Amira v. Waldvierteler Forst12.50011
    Otti v. Lönsstein12.50011
    Basko v. Tannengarten12.50011
    Karlo v. d. Jade12.50011
    Bonny v. Frochtmannshof12.50011
    Aikfried v. Murner See12.50011
    Eddy v. d. Pfauheck9.370211
    Grandl De Wynen6.25011
    Foks v. Langer-Rau6.25011
    Quinta v. Fasanenhof6.25011
    Queen v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Gero v. Reitbach6.25011
    Don v. Forst Ostenwalde6.25011
    Greif v. Reitbach6.25011
    Heidehexe v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Debby v. Emsdeich6.25011
    Victor v. Poppenforst6.25011
    Cora v. Mittelrhein6.25011
    Jule v. Linduri6.25011
    Westfalen's Cuno6.25011
    Hasko v. Linebrok6.25011
    Antje v. Horum6.25011
    Rika v. Linduri6.24022
    Arras v. Eschbach6.24022
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Herman v. Schatzrain3.12011
    Bautz v. d. Leda3.12011
    Kascha v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Bodo v. Steyerberg3.12011
    Xanthippe De Wynen3.12011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Hedda v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Burga v. d. Heustätte3.12011
    Groll v. Huntetal3.12011
    Dean v. d. Schmiede3.12011
    Don v. Langer-Rau3.12011
    Aika v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Arko v. d. Seewiese3.12011
    Quell v. Huntetal3.12011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Cody v. Emsdeich3.12011
    Hesta v. Linduri3.12011
    Kira v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Juwel v. Perverberg3.12011
    Kastor v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Bea v. Calveslage3.12011
    Farah v. Hilkefeld3.12011
    Rena v. Elbufer3.12011
    Gera v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Elfe v. Linebrok3.12011
    Dolly v. Langer-Rau3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s