Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Neandertal's Feeh
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Neandertal's Feeh
    COI 5 gen: 1.172%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Neandertal's Artus and Dam Montana v. Heesenhof
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.195%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 1.172%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)59
    Ancestor Loss3
    Ancestor Loss in %95.16 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Neandertal's Artus50.00011
    Montana v. Heesenhof50.00011
    Bella v. d. Röttenkath25.00011
    Blue v. Mühbrooker Meer25.00011
    Anton v. Kirchhof25.00011
    Crash v. Ziegelweiher25.00011
    Aron v. Averbeck12.50011
    Kaja v. Heesenhof12.50011
    Westfalen's Birka12.50011
    Karlo v. d. Jade12.50011
    Aikfried v. Murner See12.50011
    Bonny v. Frochtmannshof12.50011
    Greif v. Reitbach12.50011
    Erle v. d. Segeberger Heide12.50011
    Kira v. Tillplatz9.370211
    Arras v. Eschbach9.370211
    Rika v. Linduri9.370211
    Cora v. Mittelrhein6.25011
    Distel v.d. Segeberger Heide6.25011
    Gauner v. Stockey6.25011
    Hasko v. Linebrok6.25011
    Westfalen's Cuno6.25011
    Quinta v. Fasanenhof6.25011
    Antje v. Horum6.25011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern6.25011
    Gero v. Reitbach6.25011
    Grandl De Wynen6.25011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg6.25011
    Foks v. Langer-Rau6.25011
    Conrad v. Birkengehege6.25011
    Pom v. Minatal3.12011
    Horrik v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Laika v. Linduri3.12011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide3.12011
    Juwel v. Perverberg3.12011
    Kastor v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Bautz v. d. Leda3.12011
    Eddy v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Alice v. Wiebusch3.12011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Rena v. Elbufer3.12011
    Cody v. Emsdeich3.12011
    Bea v. Calveslage3.12011
    Dana v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Alex v. Bannwald3.12011
    Elfe v. Linebrok3.12011
    Gina v. Roonstein3.12011
    Dolly v. Langer-Rau3.12011
    Burga v. d. Heustätte3.12011
    Anka v. Schönrain3.12011
    Xanthippe De Wynen3.12011
    Evita v. Stockey3.12011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Gordon v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Arras v. Eikenloh3.12011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund3.12011
    Dean v. d. Schmiede3.12011
    Arco v. Backemeer3.12011
    Arko v. d. Seewiese3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s