Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Dax v. Erzhorst
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Dax v. Erzhorst
    COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Calle v. d. Reutereiche and Dam Jorke v. Lanhausen
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.195%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)61
    Ancestor Loss1
    Ancestor Loss in %98.39 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Jorke v. Lanhausen50.00011
    Calle v. d. Reutereiche50.00011
    Dina v. Forstkamp25.00011
    Heinz v. Rodekopp25.00011
    Habbo v. Frochtmannshof25.00011
    Bessy v.d. Reutereiche25.00011
    Elsbeth v. Rodekopp12.50011
    Hektor v. Emsdeich12.50011
    Andra v.d. Reutereiche12.50011
    Askan v. d. Klosterwiese12.50011
    Eika v. Frochtmannshof12.50011
    Biene v. Forstkamp12.50011
    Egon v. Buchheim12.50011
    Wenzel v. Elbufer12.50011
    Arras v. Eschbach9.370211
    Maja Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Ira v. Stockey6.25011
    Samson v. Linduri6.25011
    Quinta v. Fasanenhof6.25011
    Assi v. Forstkamp6.25011
    Hermann v. Stellfelde6.25011
    Westfalen's Chef6.25011
    Aika v. Rodekopp6.25011
    Quino Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land6.25011
    Aron v. Averbeck6.25011
    Greif v. Reitbach6.25011
    Rivkah v. Buchheim6.25011
    Dina v. d. Himmerner Heide6.25011
    Debby v. Emsdeich6.25011
    Hesta v. Linduri3.12011
    Kira v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Quell v. Huntetal3.12011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Farah v. Hilkefeld3.12011
    Juwel v. Perverberg3.12011
    Don v. Forst Ostenwalde3.12011
    Burga v. d. Heustätte3.12011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek3.12011
    Lilli v. Buchheim3.12011
    Dolf v. Mönchsbrunnen3.12011
    Foks v. Langer-Rau3.12011
    Tanja De Wynen3.12011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern3.12011
    Gusti v. Stockey3.12011
    Ondra Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Gina v. Roonstein3.12011
    Artos v. d. Schirmkiefer3.12011
    Rika v. Linduri3.12011
    Herman v. Schatzrain3.12011
    Meika v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Aika v. Buchwald3.12011
    Linda v. Fasanenhof3.12011
    Effi v. Stellfelde3.12011
    Arras v. Eikenloh3.12011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Aury v. Waidbosch3.12011
    Pascha v. Elbufer3.12011
    Asmus v. d. Segeberger Heide3.12011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s