Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Dira lll v. Buchheim
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Dira lll v. Buchheim
    COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Timmi v. Buchheim and Dam Erle v. d. Frankenhöhe
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 1.562%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)59
    Ancestor Loss3
    Ancestor Loss in %95.16 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Erle v. d. Frankenhöhe50.00011
    Timmi v. Buchheim50.00011
    Basko v. Aartal25.00011
    Regent v. Buchheim25.00011
    Iska v. Erlengrund25.00011
    Orvett v. Buchheim25.00011
    Basca v. Mühbrooker Meer12.50011
    Jana v. d. Riedleite12.50011
    Schorsch v. d. Schmiede12.50011
    Jazz v. Buchheim12.50011
    Axel v. Murner See12.50011
    Faust v. d. Mainauen12.50011
    Locke v. Buchheim12.50011
    Akim v. Rothsee12.50011
    Greif v. Reitbach12.490312
    Erle v. d. Segeberger Heide6.25011
    Foko v. Erlengrund6.25011
    Jessy v. d. Schmiede6.25011
    Leonie v. Alten Hafen6.25011
    Horneth v. Buchheim6.25011
    Grandl De Wynen6.25011
    Hanno v. Emsdeich6.25011
    Bonie v. Keltenquell6.25011
    Egon v. Buchheim6.25011
    Etzel v. Buchheim6.25011
    Foks v. Langer-Rau6.25011
    Elch v. Rodekopp6.25011
    Bara v.d. Mainauen6.25011
    Cora v. Deutschen Orden6.25011
    Boss v. Mellin6.25011
    Westfalen's Chef6.24022
    Igor v. Perverberg3.12011
    Dean v. d. Schmiede3.12011
    Centa v. Kirschenberg3.12011
    Caesar v. Holdergrund3.12011
    Ondra v. Stockey3.12011
    Alexa v. Deutchen Orden3.12011
    Arko v. d. Seewiese3.12011
    Karlo v. Linebrok3.12011
    Mona v. Linduri3.12011
    Distel v.d. Segeberger Heide3.12011
    Fabo v. Siegbogen3.12011
    Etzel Aus Moor Und Heide3.12011
    Anja v. Veybach3.12011
    Aika v. Rodekopp3.12011
    Arras v. Eschbach3.12011
    Dolly v. Langer-Rau3.12011
    Rika v. Linduri3.12011
    Debby v. Emsdeich3.12011
    Rivkah v. Buchheim3.12011
    Katteneck's Daisy3.12011
    Basko v. Tannengarten3.12011
    Unken v. Buchheim3.12011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land3.12011
    Bonie v. Birkengehege3.12011
    Achill v.d. Krakequelle3.12011
    Nesta v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Xanthippe De Wynen3.12011
    Conrad v. Birkengehege3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s