Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Neptun v. Eulenspiegel
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Neptun v. Eulenspiegel
    COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Sami v. Schatzrain and Dam Maite v. d. Riede
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 1.172%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)62
    Ancestor Loss0
    Ancestor Loss in %100.00 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Maite v. d. Riede50.00011
    Sami v. Schatzrain50.00011
    Akim v. Rothsee25.00011
    Grace v. Frochtmannshof25.00011
    Okka v. Schatzrain25.00011
    Kondy v. d. Horstbüschen25.00011
    Greif v. Reitbach12.50011
    Dean v. d. Horstbüschen12.50011
    Elch v. Rodekopp12.50011
    Cora v. Deutschen Orden12.50011
    Chef v. Seulingswald12.50011
    Mona v. Schatzrain12.50011
    Eika v. Frochtmannshof12.50011
    Emmy v. d. Horstbüschen12.50011
    Quinta v. Fasanenhof6.25011
    Moni v. Tillplatz6.25011
    Helge v. Schatzrain6.25011
    Quell v. Huntetal6.25011
    Ibse v. Linebrok6.25011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land6.25011
    Arras v. Eschbach6.25011
    Igor v. Perverberg6.25011
    Alexa v. Deutchen Orden6.25011
    Eddy v. d. Pfauheck6.25011
    Aron v. Averbeck6.25011
    Gauner v. Stockey6.25011
    Anton v. Keltenquell6.25011
    Bea v. d.Manningaburg6.25011
    Aika v. Rodekopp6.25011
    Rika v. Linduri6.25011
    Burga v. d. Heustätte3.12011
    Xaver v. d. Binnenelbe3.12011
    Dina v. Schatzrain3.12011
    Lord v. Jurawald3.12011
    Arras v. Eikenloh3.12011
    Henk v. Huntetal3.12011
    Ira v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Alex v. Bannwald3.12011
    Archibald v. d. Segeberger Heide3.12011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg3.12011
    Aury v. Waidbosch3.12011
    Grille v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Maika v. Wiken3.12011
    Halla v. Linduri3.12011
    Elfe v. Linebrok3.12011
    Solojäger's Monarch3.12011
    Aika v. Buchwald3.12011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Evita v. Stockey3.12011
    Juwel v. Perverberg3.12011
    Bautz v. d. Leda3.12011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund3.12011
    Artus v. Elztal3.12011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern3.12011
    Bodo v. Steyerberg3.12011
    Arco v. Backemeer3.12011
    Mirco v. Linduri3.12011
    Gina v. Roonstein3.12011
    Aika v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Tanja De Wynen3.12011
    Gitta v. Buchheim3.12011
    Bonie v. Birkengehege3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s