Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Elmo v. Horster Wald
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Elmo v. Horster Wald
    COI 5 gen: 0.684%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Heros v. Deutschen Orden and Dam Cita v. Röringshoff
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 3.320%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)59
    Ancestor Loss3
    Ancestor Loss in %95.16 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Cita v. Röringshoff50.00011
    Heros v. Deutschen Orden50.00011
    Vasko v. d. Hafkesdell25.00011
    Gloria v. Deutschen Orden25.00011
    Packo v. Heek25.00011
    Bella v. Röringhoff25.00011
    Thantalos v. Stockey12.50011
    Falko v. Forst Ostenwalde12.50011
    Suko v. d. Hafkesdell12.50011
    Ilka v. Heek12.50011
    Finni v. Deutschen Orden12.50011
    Arthus v. Kandelwald12.50011
    Ivo v. Reitbach12.50011
    Bessy v. Rotholz12.50011
    Gera v. d. Hafkesdell9.370211
    Westfalen's Chef9.370211
    Westfalen's Artus6.25011
    Anka v. Deutschen Orden6.25011
    Dora v. Deutschen Orden6.25011
    Solo v. Stockey6.25011
    Caj v. Alt-Hümmling6.25011
    Dag v. Betzloh6.25011
    Chefin v.Mellin6.25011
    Arras v. d. Segeberger Heide6.25011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Anka v. Heek6.25011
    Gora v. Reitbach6.25011
    Over v. d. Hafkesdell6.25011
    Aiko v. Aischtal6.25011
    Urmel v. Linduri6.25011
    Kira v. Tillplatz6.24022
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Igor v. Linebrok3.12011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald3.12011
    Dargo v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Arras v. Eschbach3.12011
    Alexa v. Deutchen Orden3.12011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land3.12011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide3.12011
    Asta v. Averbeck3.12011
    Etzel v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern3.12011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Laura v. Poppenforst3.12011
    Aischa v. Heek3.12011
    Aspe v. Betzloh3.12011
    Eddy v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Rika v. Linduri3.12011
    Gitta v. Buchheim3.12011
    Cora v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Pascha v. Elbufer3.12011
    Archibald v. d. Segeberger Heide3.12011
    Coach v. Ziegelweiher3.12011
    Bella-Donna v. Mellin3.12011
    Hesta v. Linduri3.12011
    Lord v. Jurawald3.12011
    Samson v. Linduri3.12011
    Ondra v. Stockey3.12011
    Britta v. Distelberg3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s