Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Dina v. d. Wolffs Höhle
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Dina v. d. Wolffs Höhle
    COI 5 gen: 0.977%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Bullenbarger's Asko and Dam Amke v. d. Wollf's Höhle
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 1.562%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.195%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)58
    Ancestor Loss4
    Ancestor Loss in %93.55 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Bullenbarger's Asko50.00011
    Amke v. d. Wollf's Höhle50.00011
    Hanni v. Fliethbachtal25.00011
    Hardy v. Heek25.00011
    Finja v. Horum25.00011
    Freddy v. Hollbäck25.00011
    Aska v. Forstkamp12.50022
    Elvis v. Horum12.50011
    Max v. Wuddelhof12.50011
    Cilly v. Hollbäck12.50011
    Indra v. d. Edelesse12.50011
    Asta v. Averbeck12.50011
    Fee v. Fliethbachtal12.50011
    Greif v. Reitbach12.50011
    Ando v. Hollbäck12.50011
    Frieda v. Wolfethal6.25011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg6.25011
    Basko v. Alt-Hümmling6.25011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern6.25011
    Coach v. Ziegelweiher6.25011
    Wilco v. Huntetal6.25011
    Rika v. Linduri6.25011
    Arras v. Eschbach6.25011
    Dascha v. Fliethbachtal6.25011
    Bea v. Calveslage6.25011
    Sepp Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Janka v. Wuddelhof6.25011
    Cicero v. Eulenspiegel6.25011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Karlo v. Linebrok6.24022
    Artos v. d. Schirmkiefer6.24022
    Meika v. Wasserplatz6.24022
    Quendy v. Huntetal3.12011
    Rocky v. Neuarenberg DK3.12011
    Cora v. Bonrechtern3.12011
    Ayla A. d. Holzland3.12011
    Eddy v. Riehenbusch3.12011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde3.12011
    Euro v. Blumenhof3.12011
    Bautz v. d. Leda3.12011
    Solojäger's Laura3.12011
    Aischa v. Heek3.12011
    Anka v. Schönrain3.12011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Hanno v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Aron v. Averbeck3.12011
    Benja v. Fliethbachtal3.12011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund3.12011
    Gina v. Roonstein3.12011
    Gerrit v. Wuddelhof3.12011
    Gordon v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Arras v. Eikenloh3.12011
    Dagobert v. Hege-Haus DK3.12011
    Paula Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Alice v. Wiebusch3.12011
    Castor v. d. Hirtenburg3.12011
    Westfalen's Birka3.12011
    Isolde v. Alten Hafen3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s