Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Jane ll v. d. Schmiede
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Jane ll v. d. Schmiede
    COI 5 gen: 0.879%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Cooper v. Aartal and Dam Zensi v. d. Schmiede
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 1.953%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)58
    Ancestor Loss4
    Ancestor Loss in %93.55 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Cooper v. Aartal50.00011
    Zensi v. d. Schmiede50.00011
    Pharo v. d. Schmiede25.00011
    Daisy v. Schönrain25.00011
    Bailey v. Aartal25.00011
    Freddy v. Hollbäck25.00011
    Max v. Wuddelhof12.50011
    Axel v. Murner See12.50011
    Bessy v. Schönrain12.50011
    Ivan v. d. Schmiede12.50011
    Basca v. Mühbrooker Meer12.50011
    Nixe v. Wasserplatz12.50011
    Cilly v. Hollbäck12.50011
    Uhl II v. Lönsstein12.50011
    Dean v. d. Schmiede9.370211
    Eddy v. Riehenbusch9.370211
    Greif v. Reitbach6.25011
    Esta v. d. Schmiede6.25011
    Sepp Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Kascha v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Coach v. Ziegelweiher6.25011
    Janka v. Wuddelhof6.25011
    Foks v. Langer-Rau6.25011
    Erle v. d. Segeberger Heide6.25011
    Freia v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Aska v. Forstkamp6.25011
    Blitz v. Rottenanger6.25011
    Grandl De Wynen6.25011
    Otti v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Dag v. Betzloh6.25011
    Aury v. Waidbosch6.24022
    Laura v. Poppenforst6.24022
    Osca v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Chris v. d. Schmiede3.12011
    Castor v. d. Hirtenburg3.12011
    Xanthippe De Wynen3.12011
    Dolly v. Langer-Rau3.12011
    Assi v. Hegholz3.12011
    Conrad v. Birkengehege3.12011
    Gerrit v. Wuddelhof3.12011
    Arco v. Backemeer3.12011
    Arko v. d. Seewiese3.12011
    Don v. Forst Ostenwalde3.12011
    Nostra De Wynen3.12011
    Paula Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Graf Nelha3.12011
    Arras v. Eschbach3.12011
    Distel v.d. Segeberger Heide3.12011
    Bessy v. d. Schmiede3.12011
    Aron v. Averbeck3.12011
    Lukas v. Linduri3.12011
    Rika v. Linduri3.12011
    Artos v. d. Schirmkiefer3.12011
    Pascha v. Elbufer3.12011
    Heidehexe v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Westfalen's Birka3.12011
    Meika v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Aspe v. Betzloh3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s