Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Chacky v. Hartwald
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Chacky v. Hartwald
    COI 5 gen: 0.586%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Cooper v. Aartal and Dam Aspe v. Hartwald
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)59
    Ancestor Loss3
    Ancestor Loss in %95.16 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Aspe v. Hartwald50.00011
    Cooper v. Aartal50.00011
    Freddy v. Hollbäck25.00011
    Vasko v. d. Hafkesdell25.00011
    Assi v. Mühlhof25.00011
    Bailey v. Aartal25.00011
    Pasca v. Niddatal12.50011
    Falko v. Forst Ostenwalde12.50011
    Max v. Wuddelhof12.50011
    Suko v. d. Hafkesdell12.50011
    Basca v. Mühbrooker Meer12.50011
    Axel v. Murner See12.50011
    Zeus v. Linduri12.50011
    Cilly v. Hollbäck12.50011
    Aron v. Averbeck9.370211
    Gera v. d. Hafkesdell6.25011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Foks v. Langer-Rau6.25011
    Greif v. Reitbach6.25011
    Diana v. Buchwald6.25011
    Sepp Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Westfalen's Cuno6.25011
    Aska v. Forstkamp6.25011
    Janka v. Wuddelhof6.25011
    Westfalen's Artus6.25011
    Erle v. d. Segeberger Heide6.25011
    Grandl De Wynen6.25011
    Dunja v. Reitbach6.25011
    Coach v. Ziegelweiher6.25011
    Arras v. d. Segeberger Heide6.25011
    Kira v. Tillplatz6.24022
    Rika v. Linduri6.24022
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald3.12011
    Meika v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Eddy v. Riehenbusch3.12011
    Dean v. d. Schmiede3.12011
    Arras v. Eikenloh3.12011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Cora v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Arko v. d. Seewiese3.12011
    Castor v. d. Hirtenburg3.12011
    Laura v. Poppenforst3.12011
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg3.12011
    Westfalen's Birka3.12011
    Dolly v. Langer-Rau3.12011
    Dargo v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide3.12011
    Tessa v. Lossetal3.12011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land3.12011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern3.12011
    Conrad v. Birkengehege3.12011
    Gerrit v. Wuddelhof3.12011
    Pascha v. Elbufer3.12011
    Distel v.d. Segeberger Heide3.12011
    Paula Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Xanthippe De Wynen3.12011
    Arras v. Eschbach3.12011
    Artos v. d. Schirmkiefer3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s