Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Calibär v. Hegemeister
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Calibär v. Hegemeister
    COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Duke Bavaria and Dam Amira v. Hegemeister
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.977%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)61
    Ancestor Loss1
    Ancestor Loss in %98.39 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Duke Bavaria50.00011
    Amira v. Hegemeister50.00011
    Juri v. Frochtmannshof25.00011
    Kuno v. d. Horstbüschen25.00011
    Betty Blue Bavaria25.00011
    Enja v. Seulingswald25.00011
    Emmy v. d. Horstbüschen12.50011
    Jesko v. Heek12.50011
    Dean v. d. Horstbüschen12.50011
    Eika v. Frochtmannshof12.50011
    Aika v. Seulingswald12.50011
    Solojäger's Unkas12.50011
    Askan v. d. Klosterwiese12.50011
    Gina L v. Rodekopp12.50011
    Arras v. Eikenloh9.370211
    Osca Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Hardy v. Paradies6.25011
    Bea v. d.Manningaburg6.25011
    Moni v. Tillplatz6.25011
    Basco v. Matzental6.25011
    Ibse v. Linebrok6.25011
    Dina v. d. Himmerner Heide6.25011
    Quell v. Huntetal6.25011
    Quinta v. Fasanenhof6.25011
    Elsbeth v. Rodekopp6.25011
    Solojäger's Maraun6.25011
    Arras v. Eschbach6.25011
    Eddy v. d. Pfauheck6.25011
    Aron v. Averbeck6.25011
    Cora v. Heek6.25011
    Halla v. Linduri3.12011
    Mirco v. Linduri3.12011
    Dele v. Paradies3.12011
    Gina v. Roonstein3.12011
    Burga v. d. Heustätte3.12011
    Arco v. Backemeer3.12011
    Jola Nelha3.12011
    Aika v. Rodekopp3.12011
    Ira v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Maika v. Wiken3.12011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg3.12011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land3.12011
    Orka v. d. Drachheide3.12011
    Archibald v. d. Segeberger Heide3.12011
    Lukas v. Linduri3.12011
    Lucie Nelha3.12011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde3.12011
    Anka v. Heek3.12011
    Bodo v. Steyerberg3.12011
    Linda v. Fasanenhof3.12011
    Elfe v. Linebrok3.12011
    Juwel v. Perverberg3.12011
    Don v. Forst Ostenwalde3.12011
    Aika v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Etzel v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern3.12011
    Samson v. Linduri3.12011
    Henk v. Huntetal3.12011
    Solojäger's Laura3.12011
    Isko v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Asta v. Pamesgrub3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s