Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Ilka v. Hollbäck
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Ilka v. Hollbäck
    COI 5 gen: 1.172%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Ronaldo v. Poppenforst and Dam Hummel v. Hollbäck
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 3.906%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)56
    Ancestor Loss6
    Ancestor Loss in %90.32 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Hummel v. Hollbäck50.00011
    Ronaldo v. Poppenforst50.00011
    Basko v. Aartal25.00011
    Lindemann's Akita25.00011
    Cilly v. Hollbäck25.00011
    Yordi v. Stockey25.00011
    Westfalen's Chef12.50022
    Bella-Donna v. Mellin12.50011
    Aska v. Forstkamp12.50011
    Chef v. Seulingswald12.50011
    Axel v. Murner See12.50011
    Elli v. Heek12.50011
    Coach v. Ziegelweiher12.50011
    Anton v. d. Klosterwiese12.50011
    Basca v. Mühbrooker Meer12.50011
    Gauner v. Stockey9.370211
    Arras v. Eschbach9.370211
    Kira v. Tillplatz9.36033
    Foks v. Langer-Rau6.25011
    Meika v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Erle v. d. Segeberger Heide6.25011
    Grandl De Wynen6.25011
    Ibse v. Linebrok6.25011
    Dina v. d. Himmerner Heide6.25011
    Greif v. Reitbach6.25011
    Westfalen's Birka6.25011
    Anka v. Heek6.25011
    Ondra v. Stockey6.25011
    Aron v. Averbeck6.25011
    Artos v. d. Schirmkiefer6.25011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga6.24022
    Alex v. Bannwald3.12011
    Evita v. Stockey3.12011
    Arras v. Eikenloh3.12011
    Asta v. Averbeck3.12011
    Uri v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern3.12011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg3.12011
    Dixie v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Distel v.d. Segeberger Heide3.12011
    Xanthippe De Wynen3.12011
    Dean v. d. Schmiede3.12011
    Rika v. Linduri3.12011
    Igor v. Linebrok3.12011
    Arko v. d. Seewiese3.12011
    Archibald v. d. Segeberger Heide3.12011
    Conrad v. Birkengehege3.12011
    Dolly v. Langer-Rau3.12011
    Birka v. d. Hirtenburg3.12011
    Don v. Forst Ostenwalde3.12011
    Arko v. Fliethbachtal3.12011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Gusti v. Stockey3.12011
    Linda v. Fasanenhof3.12011
    Elfe v. Linebrok3.12011
    Gina v. Roonstein3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s