Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Perle (Per Kolding)
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Perle (Per Kolding)
    COI 5 gen: 1.270%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Pico v. d. Horstbüschen and Dam Caja (Jens Sørensen)
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 1.367%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 2.344%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)57
    Ancestor Loss5
    Ancestor Loss in %91.94 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Caja (Jens Sørensen)50.00011
    Pico v. d. Horstbüschen50.00011
    Ida v. Frochtmannshof25.00011
    Neele v.d. Horstbüschen25.00011
    Gandhi v. Bussenhof25.00011
    Arco v. Hautzerfeld25.00011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga15.620211
    Anton v. Steinbachtal12.50011
    Lucky v. Heesenhof12.50011
    Kim v. d. Horstbüschen12.50011
    Dina v. Ziegelweiher12.50011
    Asso v. Jeddeloher Esch12.50011
    Cilly v. Hollbäck12.50011
    Eika v. Frochtmannshof12.50011
    Aron v. Averbeck12.490312
    Westfalen's Birka9.370211
    Quinta v. Fasanenhof6.25011
    Dean v. d. Horstbüschen6.25011
    Askan v. d. Klosterwiese6.25011
    Hanno v. Emsdeich6.25011
    Emmy v. d. Horstbüschen6.25011
    Aska v. Forstkamp6.25011
    Anka v. Rothsee6.25011
    Westfalen's Cuno6.25011
    Fina v. Neuenkämpen6.25011
    Solojäger's Laura6.25011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde6.25011
    Aikfried v. Murner See6.25011
    Cora v. Mittelrhein6.25011
    Coach v. Ziegelweiher6.25011
    Kira v. Tillplatz6.24022
    Kastor v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Solojäger's Harras3.12011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Rena v. Elbufer3.12011
    Cim v. Wuddelhoff3.12011
    Moni v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Foks v. Langer-Rau3.12011
    Bea v. d.Manningaburg3.12011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Quell v. Huntetal3.12011
    Dina v. Neuenkämpen3.12011
    Greif v. Reitbach3.12011
    Eddy v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Juwel v. Perverberg3.12011
    Dina v. d. Himmerner Heide3.12011
    Debby v. Emsdeich3.12011
    Gauner v. Stockey3.12011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern3.12011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg3.12011
    Elch v. Rodekopp3.12011
    Cora v. Deutschen Orden3.12011
    Artos v. d. Schirmkiefer3.12011
    Burga v. d. Heustätte3.12011
    Grandl De Wynen3.12011
    Arras v. Eschbach3.12011
    Meika v. Wasserplatz3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s