Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Itta ll v. d. Schmiede
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Itta ll v. d. Schmiede
    COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Elvis v. Schönrain and Dam Fransi v. d. Schmiede
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.977%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)62
    Ancestor Loss0
    Ancestor Loss in %100.00 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Elvis v. Schönrain50.00011
    Fransi v. d. Schmiede50.00011
    Bento Bavaria25.00011
    Yinka v. d. Schmiede25.00011
    Leo v. Fränkischen Bauern25.00011
    Dora v. Schönrain25.00011
    Faust v. d. Mainauen12.50011
    Ivan v. d. Schmiede12.50011
    Katta v. d. Schmiede12.50011
    Bessy v. Schönrain12.50011
    Vasko v. d. Hafkesdell12.50011
    Gina L v. Rodekopp12.50011
    Illa v. Fränkischen Bauern12.50011
    Jesko v. Heek12.50011
    Basco v. Matzental6.25011
    Hanno v. Emsdeich6.25011
    Bara v.d. Mainauen6.25011
    Nixe v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Freia v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Westfalen's Cuno6.25011
    Elsbeth v. Rodekopp6.25011
    Blitz v. Rottenanger6.25011
    Etzel Aus Moor Und Heide6.25011
    Cora v. Heek6.25011
    Erle v. Fränkischen Bauern6.25011
    Dag v. Betzloh6.25011
    Falko v. Forst Ostenwalde6.25011
    Suko v. d. Hafkesdell6.25011
    Hardy v. Paradies6.25011
    Esta v. d. Schmiede6.25011
    Assi v. Hegholz3.12011
    Kira v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Ivo v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Arras v. d. Segeberger Heide3.12011
    Graf Nelha3.12011
    Orka v. d. Drachheide3.12011
    Castor v. Bakumer Esch3.12011
    Anka v. Heek3.12011
    Greif v. Reitbach3.12011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land3.12011
    Kascha v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Debby v. Emsdeich3.12011
    Achill v.d. Krakequelle3.12011
    Pascha v. Elbufer3.12011
    Dele v. Paradies3.12011
    Centa v. Kirschenberg3.12011
    Ussa v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Aika v. Rodekopp3.12011
    Asta v. Pamesgrub3.12011
    Chris v. d. Schmiede3.12011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Laura v. Poppenforst3.12011
    Osca v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Gera v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Samson v. Linduri3.12011
    Cilly v. Fränkischen Bauern3.12011
    Aspe v. Betzloh3.12011
    Aury v. Waidbosch3.12011
    Dean v. d. Schmiede3.12011
    Isko v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Westfalen's Artus3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s