Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Schari v. Paradies
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Schari v. Paradies
    COI 5 gen: 0.977%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Yasper v. Buchheim and Dam Quentje v. Paradies
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 1.562%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.488%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)77
    Ancestor Loss-15
    Ancestor Loss in %124.19 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Quentje v. Paradies50.00011
    Yasper v. Buchheim50.00011
    Merle v. Paradies25.00011
    Raizza v. Buchheim25.00011
    Evita v. Stockey25.00011
    Bexter v.d. Reutereiche25.00011
    Avanti v. d. Frankenhöhe25.00011
    Alex v. Bannwald25.00011
    Westfalen's Artus12.50011
    Jazz v. Buchheim12.50011
    Branca v. d. Biberquelle12.50011
    Asco Westerode12.50011
    Chica v. d. Hafkesdell12.50011
    Hektor v. Emsdeich12.50011
    Andra v.d. Reutereiche12.50011
    Schorsch v. d. Schmiede12.50011
    Hexe v. Paradies12.50011
    Solojäger's Harras12.50011
    Greif v. Reitbach9.370211
    Isko v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Dina Chamavia6.25011
    Kira v. Tillplatz6.25011
    Etzel v. Buchheim6.25011
    Amber De Wynen6.25011
    Debby v. Emsdeich6.25011
    Leonie v. Alten Hafen6.25011
    Alf v. Siegbogen6.25011
    Nimrod's Birko6.25011
    Dele v. Paradies6.25011
    Dargo v. d. Hafkesdell6.25011
    Solojäger's Distel6.25011
    Boss v. Mellin6.25011
    Zick v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Becas v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Afra v. d. Bohlsener Mühle6.25011
    Samson v. Linduri6.25011
    Ira v. Stockey6.25011
    Jessy v. d. Schmiede6.25011
    Unda v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Citta v. Langen Siek3.12011
    Lyra v. d. Königseiche3.12011
    Carmen v. d. Nordmannstannen3.12011
    Gusti v. Stockey3.12011
    Erko v. Jahnplatz3.12011
    Edda v. Jurawald3.12011
    Baco v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Arco v. Backemeer3.12011
    Farah v. Hilkefeld3.12011
    Basko v. Tannengarten3.12011
    Katteneck's Daisy3.12011
    Cent v. Hofried3.12011
    Priska De Wynen3.12011
    Cliff v. Linduri3.12011
    Dana v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Cäsar v. Elsternkamp3.12011
    Herman v. Schatzrain3.12011
    Uta Chamavia3.12011
    Harro v. Lossetal3.12011
    Etzel Aus Moor Und Heide3.12011
    Anja v. Veybach3.12011
    Bautz v. Mönchsbrunnen3.12011
    Josi v. Königsfeld3.12011
    Bautz v. d. Leda3.12011
    Rika v. Linduri3.12011
    Arras v. Eschbach3.12011
    Nesta v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Alf v. Rauhen Ebrach Tal3.12011
    Kora v. Königsfeld3.12011
    Hesta v. Linduri3.12011
    Annett v. Paradies3.12011
    Quell v. Huntetal3.12011
    Hektor v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Ino v. Kreyenhorst3.12011
    Vroni v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Cita v. Winterberg3.12011
    Baldur v. Lönsstein3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s