Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Pascal De Wynen
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Pascal De Wynen
    COI 5 gen: 0.195%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Elch v. Jägerkreuz and Dam Rachel De Wynen
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.977%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 1.562%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)59
    Ancestor Loss3
    Ancestor Loss in %95.16 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Rachel De Wynen50.00011
    Elch v. Jägerkreuz50.00011
    Cai Holsatia25.00011
    Anja v. Salinenblick25.00011
    Hecht v. d. Königseiche25.00011
    Xandra v. Lönsstein25.00011
    Mary v. Lönsstein12.50011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein12.50011
    Dolf v. Lönsstein12.50011
    Hanko v. Sämmenhof12.50011
    Gundi v. d. Königseiche12.50011
    Boss v. Silbersee12.50011
    Jette v. d. Bilsbek12.50011
    Hussa v. Rheinufer12.50011
    Anka v. d. Vereinigung6.25011
    Alf v. d. Strohee6.25011
    Natter v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Certa v. d. Frankenburg6.25011
    Bodo v. Weserstrand6.25011
    Citta v. Langen Siek6.25011
    Ino v. Kreyenhorst6.25011
    Immo v. d. Binnenelbe6.25011
    Okko Fortuna6.25011
    Cäsar v. d. Hohen Geest6.25011
    Alfa v. d. Mollwiese6.25011
    Baron v. Rehsprung6.25011
    Piter v. Feuersang6.25011
    Eike v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Bianka v. d. Königseiche6.25011
    Fina v. Kuhlenbruch6.25011
    Assi v. Lönsstein6.24022
    Cäsar v. d Holzheide3.12011
    Juno Fortuna3.12011
    Illa v. Feuersang3.12011
    Zent v. Feuersang3.12011
    Axel v. Teufelsloch3.12011
    Cita Germania3.12011
    Arko v. d. Falloh3.12011
    Imme v. Feuersang3.12011
    Atempo v. d. Eggemerigge3.12011
    Flott v. Feuersang3.12011
    Asta v. d. Frankenburg3.12011
    Hecht v. Schlemminer Forst3.12011
    Whisky v. Schwege3.12011
    Dolly v. Konigsthal3.12011
    Donar v. Alten Zollhaus3.12011
    Eiko v. Feuersang3.12011
    Arno v. Karlshof3.12011
    Diva v. d. Uhrau3.12011
    Anka v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Fenna v. Kreyenhorst3.12011
    Chisko Jenno Graf v. Amelsbüren3.12011
    Alf v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Cora v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Axel v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Dax v. Horsetal3.12011
    Eike v. d. Binnenelbe3.12011
    Lord v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Daisy v. Sämmenhof3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s