Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Amadeus v. Zeinenbusch
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Amadeus v. Zeinenbusch
    COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Caruso v. d. Hutteneiche and Dam Tosca v. Linebrok
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.586%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 5.078%    low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)58
    Ancestor Loss4
    Ancestor Loss in %93.55 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Caruso v. d. Hutteneiche50.00011
    Tosca v. Linebrok50.00011
    Gustav v. Deutschen Orden25.00011
    Perle v. Linebrok25.00011
    Gitti v. Veybach25.00011
    Bento Bavaria25.00011
    Finni v. Deutschen Orden12.50011
    Boss v. Mellin12.50011
    Jesko v. Heek12.50011
    Dan v. Deutschen Orden12.50011
    Izzy v. Buchheim12.50011
    Gina L v. Rodekopp12.50011
    Arthus v. Kandelwald12.50011
    Lara v. Linebrok12.50011
    Alexa v. Deutchen Orden9.370211
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern9.370211
    Hanno v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Basco v. Matzental6.25011
    Aiko v. Aischtal6.25011
    Dag v. Betzloh6.25011
    Greif v. Reitbach6.25011
    Elsbeth v. Rodekopp6.25011
    Anka v. Deutschen Orden6.25011
    Hella v. Nörderkamp6.25011
    Westfalen's Chef6.25011
    Leonie v. Alten Hafen6.25011
    Cora v. Heek6.25011
    Dora v. Deutschen Orden6.25011
    Hardy v. Paradies6.25011
    Ondra v. Stockey6.25011
    Lord v. Jurawald6.24022
    Gitta v. Buchheim6.24022
    Anka v. Schönrain3.12011
    Pascha v. Elbufer3.12011
    Arko v. Fliethbachtal3.12011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Samson v. Linduri3.12011
    Anka v. Heek3.12011
    Britta v. Distelberg3.12011
    Aspe v. Betzloh3.12011
    Cora v. Linebrok3.12011
    Kira v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Isko v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Orka v. d. Drachheide3.12011
    Gusti v. Stockey3.12011
    Gera v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Basko v. Tannengarten3.12011
    Anja v. Veybach3.12011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land3.12011
    Dele v. Paradies3.12011
    Arras v. Eschbach3.12011
    Asta v. Pamesgrub3.12011
    Bautz v. d. Leda3.12011
    Etzel v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Aika v. Rodekopp3.12011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Groll v. Huntetal3.12011
    Rika v. Linduri3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s