Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Imea v. d. Frankenhöhe
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Imea v. d. Frankenhöhe
    COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Urban v. Buchheim and Dam Estella v. d. Frankenhöhe
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)60
    Ancestor Loss2
    Ancestor Loss in %96.77 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Urban v. Buchheim50.00011
    Estella v. d. Frankenhöhe50.00011
    Faust v. d. Mainauen25.00011
    Regent v. Buchheim25.00011
    Iska v. Erlengrund25.00011
    Locke v. Buchheim25.00011
    Bara v.d. Mainauen12.50011
    Horneth v. Buchheim12.50011
    Egon v. Buchheim12.50011
    Jazz v. Buchheim12.50011
    Akim v. Rothsee12.50011
    Jana v. d. Riedleite12.50011
    Schorsch v. d. Schmiede12.50011
    Hanno v. Emsdeich12.50011
    Greif v. Reitbach9.370211
    Westfalen's Chef9.370211
    Foko v. Erlengrund6.25011
    Jessy v. d. Schmiede6.25011
    Debby v. Emsdeich6.25011
    Bonie v. Keltenquell6.25011
    Elch v. Rodekopp6.25011
    Achill v.d. Krakequelle6.25011
    Etzel v. Buchheim6.25011
    Boss v. Mellin6.25011
    Cora v. Deutschen Orden6.25011
    Rivkah v. Buchheim6.25011
    Caesar v. Holdergrund6.25011
    Unken v. Buchheim6.25011
    Centa v. Kirschenberg6.25011
    Leonie v. Alten Hafen6.25011
    Perle v. Buchheim3.12011
    Kira v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Asmus v. d. Segeberger Heide3.12011
    Arras v. Eschbach3.12011
    Fabo v. Siegbogen3.12011
    Bonny v. Erdinger Moos3.12011
    Farah v. Hilkefeld3.12011
    Heido v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Lilli v. Buchheim3.12011
    Quell v. Huntetal3.12011
    Nixe v. Buchheim3.12011
    Basko v. Tannengarten3.12011
    Katteneck's Daisy3.12011
    Aika v. Rodekopp3.12011
    Bonie v. Birkengehege3.12011
    Igor v. Perverberg3.12011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land3.12011
    Akira v. Birkengehege3.12011
    Ondra v. Stockey3.12011
    Alexa v. Deutchen Orden3.12011
    Nesta v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Artus v. Elztal3.12011
    Rika v. Linduri3.12011
    Karlo v. Linebrok3.12011
    Mona v. Linduri3.12011
    Denver v. d. Schmiede3.12011
    Arko v. Deutschen Orden3.12011
    Etzel Aus Moor Und Heide3.12011
    Anja v. Veybach3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s