Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Aury v. Waidbosch
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Aury v. Waidbosch
    COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Esko v. Mühlenberg and Dam Ondra v. Lossetal
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 2.246%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)57
    Ancestor Loss5
    Ancestor Loss in %91.94 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Ondra v. Lossetal50.00011
    Esko v. Mühlenberg50.00011
    Hasso v. d. Holzheide25.00011
    Fanni v. Osterfeld25.00011
    Eike v. Lossetal25.00011
    Bosco v. Rotenberg25.00011
    Xandra v. Mühlenberg12.50011
    Esko v. Steinroden12.50011
    Flocke v. d. Tränke12.50011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein12.50011
    Esko Vun'N Wischhoff12.50011
    Timm v. d. Holzheide12.50011
    Cindy v. Bärenhorst12.50011
    Evi v. Neuenhof12.50011
    Zent v. Feuersang9.36033
    Biene v. Ringofen6.25011
    Cent Graf v. Amelsbüren6.25011
    Astor v. Hofried6.25011
    Ute v. Mühlenberg6.25011
    Gina Dankwarder Ode6.25011
    Natter v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Groll v. Reutherspfad6.25011
    Cita v. d. Tränke6.25011
    Afra v. Huttfleth6.25011
    Unda v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Bodo v. Weserstrand6.25011
    Dunja v. Wasserschlob6.25011
    Birko v. Holsatia6.25011
    Whisky v. Schwege6.25011
    Immo v. d. Binnenelbe6.25011
    Tim v. Feuersang6.25011
    Assi v. Lönsstein6.24022
    Diva v. d. Uhrau3.12011
    Iras v. Odisheim3.12011
    Heidi v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Freifrau v. d. Overbecker Mühle3.12011
    Asta v. d. Sechsämter Stadt3.12011
    Quinti v. Schwege3.12011
    Birko v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Dina v. Steinroden3.12011
    Heike v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Arco v. Reutherspfad3.12011
    Juri v. Wolfsgrund3.12011
    Asta v. Werlacke3.12011
    Cilli v. Berghof3.12011
    Illa v. Feuersang3.12011
    Cäsar v. d Holzheide3.12011
    Donar v. Alten Zollhaus3.12011
    Grandt v. d. Uhrau3.12011
    Hannibal v. Haberland3.12011
    Gero v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Gambo v. Werlacke3.12011
    Ysa v. Rudenhay3.12011
    Argo v. Bergwinkel3.12011
    Flora v. Settel3.12011
    Asso v. Stubben3.12011
    Manto v. d. Düsterbeck3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s