Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Abby (Staas)
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Abby (Staas)
    COI 5 gen: 0.586%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Odin v. Alt-Hümmling and Dam Amber v. Sewethof
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)59
    Ancestor Loss3
    Ancestor Loss in %95.16 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Odin v. Alt-Hümmling50.00011
    Amber v. Sewethof50.00011
    Anna v. Kirchhof25.00011
    Gonzo v. Adewacht25.00011
    Merle v. Alt-Hümmling25.00011
    Anton v. Mühlenblick25.00011
    Bismarck v. Kreidesee12.50011
    Cita v. Hollbäck12.50011
    Aikfried v. Murner See12.50011
    Freya v. Adewacht12.50011
    Ivo v. Reitbach12.50011
    Cleo a. d. Holzland12.50011
    Elvis v. Horum12.50011
    Bonny v. Frochtmannshof12.50011
    Caj v. Alt-Hümmling6.25011
    Quinta v. Fasanenhof6.25011
    Bea v. Calveslage6.25011
    Gora v. Reitbach6.25011
    Aska v. Forstkamp6.25011
    Eddy v. Riehenbusch6.25011
    Hasko v. Linebrok6.25011
    Westfalen's Cuno6.25011
    Amrai v. Forstkamp6.25011
    Detje v. Adewacht6.25011
    Bea a.d. Holzland6.25011
    Grandl De Wynen6.25011
    Coach v. Ziegelweiher6.25011
    Solojäger's Unkas6.25011
    Wilco v. Huntetal6.25011
    Foks v. Langer-Rau6.25011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga6.24022
    Artos v. d. Schirmkiefer6.24022
    Meika v. Wasserplatz6.24022
    Arko v. d. Seewiese3.12011
    Hanno v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Kira v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Juwel v. Perverberg3.12011
    Fara v. Bussenhof3.12011
    Solojäger's Maraun3.12011
    Cora v. Bonrechtern3.12011
    Samson v. Linduri3.12011
    Westfalen's Birka3.12011
    Este v. Linebrok3.12011
    Nostra De Wynen3.12011
    Arco v. Backemeer3.12011
    Elfe v. Linebrok3.12011
    Karlo v. Linebrok3.12011
    Eddy v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Arras v. Eschbach3.12011
    Dolly v. Langer-Rau3.12011
    Xanthippe De Wynen3.12011
    Rika v. Linduri3.12011
    Cid v. d. Segeberger Heide3.12011
    Quendy v. Huntetal3.12011
    Burga v. d. Heustätte3.12011
    Dean v. d. Schmiede3.12011
    Arko v. Deutschen Orden3.12011
    Aron v. Averbeck3.12011
    Aischa v. Heek3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s