Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Pontus v. Veybach
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Pontus v. Veybach
    COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Vitus v.d. Riedleide and Dam Milla v. Veybach
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 1.367%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)59
    Ancestor Loss3
    Ancestor Loss in %95.16 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Milla v. Veybach50.00011
    Vitus v.d. Riedleide50.00011
    Coach v. Ziegelweiher25.00011
    Iris v. d. Riedleite25.00011
    Izzy v. Buchheim25.00011
    Orkan v. Linebrok25.00011
    Westfalen's Birka12.50011
    Farah v. Kappelbuck12.50011
    Greif v. Reitbach12.50011
    Leonie v. Alten Hafen12.50011
    Lara v. Linebrok12.50011
    Perro Nelha12.50011
    Aron v. Averbeck12.50011
    Harras v. Forst Ostenwalde12.50011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern9.370211
    Elch v. Hanauer Land9.370211
    Gauner v. Stockey6.25011
    Arthus v. Kandelwald6.25011
    Basko v. Tannengarten6.25011
    Quelle v. Buchheim6.25011
    Rika v. Linduri6.25011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg6.25011
    Arras v. Eschbach6.25011
    Anja v. Veybach6.25011
    Hanno v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Solojäger's Granne6.25011
    Hella v. Nörderkamp6.25011
    Kira v. Tillplatz6.25011
    Samson v. Linduri6.25011
    Bautz v. d. Leda6.24022
    Cora v. Linebrok3.12011
    Dachs v. Wietensholt3.12011
    Alice v. Wiebusch3.12011
    Solojäger's Distel3.12011
    Hesta v. Linduri3.12011
    Gera v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Evita v. Stockey3.12011
    Laura v. Poppenforst3.12011
    Aiko v. Aischtal3.12011
    Becas v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Gina v. Roonstein3.12011
    Groll v. Huntetal3.12011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund3.12011
    Arras v. Eikenloh3.12011
    Anka v. Deutschen Orden3.12011
    Dana v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Arco v. Backemeer3.12011
    Eddy v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Anka v. Schönrain3.12011
    Distel v. Buchheim3.12011
    Alex v. Bannwald3.12011
    Milla v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Jule v. Linduri3.12011
    Gordon v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Aika v. Buchwald3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s