Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Enno v. d. Hutteneiche
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Enno v. d. Hutteneiche
    COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Duke Bavaria and Dam Alegra v. d. Hutteneiche
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.586%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)61
    Ancestor Loss1
    Ancestor Loss in %98.39 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Alegra v. d. Hutteneiche50.00011
    Duke Bavaria50.00011
    Dorn v. d. Mainauen25.00011
    Betty Blue Bavaria25.00011
    Gitti v. Veybach25.00011
    Juri v. Frochtmannshof25.00011
    Boss v. Mellin12.50011
    Eika v. Frochtmannshof12.50011
    Jesko v. Heek12.50011
    Izzy v. Buchheim12.50011
    Bara v.d. Mainauen12.50011
    Solojäger's Mélac12.50011
    Gina L v. Rodekopp12.50011
    Askan v. d. Klosterwiese12.50011
    Arras v. Eschbach9.370211
    Etzel v. d. Pfauheck6.25011
    Hardy v. Paradies6.25011
    Quinta v. Fasanenhof6.25011
    Jola Nelha6.25011
    Basco v. Matzental6.25011
    Dina v. d. Himmerner Heide6.25011
    Ondra v. Stockey6.25011
    Achill v.d. Krakequelle6.25011
    Centa v. Kirschenberg6.25011
    Elsbeth v. Rodekopp6.25011
    Greif v. Reitbach6.25011
    Leonie v. Alten Hafen6.25011
    Cora v. Heek6.25011
    Aron v. Averbeck6.25011
    Westfalen's Chef6.25011
    Aika v. Rodekopp3.12011
    Basko v. Tannengarten3.12011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Artus v. Elztal3.12011
    Akira v. Birkengehege3.12011
    Gina v. Roonstein3.12011
    Asta v. Pamesgrub3.12011
    Bodo v. Steyerberg3.12011
    Rika v. Linduri3.12011
    Arras v. Eikenloh3.12011
    Aika v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Denver v. d. Schmiede3.12011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg3.12011
    Rosa v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Kira v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Juwel v. Perverberg3.12011
    Don v. Forst Ostenwalde3.12011
    Anka v. Heek3.12011
    Arko v. Fliethbachtal3.12011
    Perle v. Buchheim3.12011
    Dax Nelha3.12011
    Orka v. d. Drachheide3.12011
    Samson v. Linduri3.12011
    Burga v. d. Heustätte3.12011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land3.12011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern3.12011
    Isko v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Linda v. Fasanenhof3.12011
    Dele v. Paradies3.12011
    Gusti v. Stockey3.12011
    Anja v. Veybach3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s