Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Cora v. d. Wolff's Höhle
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Cora v. d. Wolff's Höhle
    COI 5 gen: 0.195%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Hilco v. Kiekenbruch and Dam Finja v. Horum
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)61
    Ancestor Loss1
    Ancestor Loss in %98.39 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Hilco v. Kiekenbruch50.00011
    Finja v. Horum50.00011
    Indra v. d. Edelesse25.00011
    Gero v. Alt-Hümmling25.00011
    Clara v. Kiekenbruch25.00011
    Elvis v. Horum25.00011
    Yda v. d. Binnenelbe12.50011
    Cicero v. Eulenspiegel12.50011
    Frieda v. Wolfethal12.50011
    Cita v. Hollbäck12.50011
    Greif v. Reitbach12.50011
    Wilco v. Huntetal12.50011
    Caj v. Alt-Hümmling12.50011
    Bea v. Calveslage12.50011
    Hanno v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Arras v. Eschbach6.25011
    Quendy v. Huntetal6.25011
    Samson v. Linduri6.25011
    Aska v. Forstkamp6.25011
    Aischa v. Heek6.25011
    Gabi v.d. Röthaller6.25011
    Dagobert v. Hege-Haus DK6.25011
    Cora v. Bonrechtern6.25011
    Rika v. Linduri6.25011
    Castor v. d. Hirtenburg6.25011
    Ayla A. d. Holzland6.25011
    Rocky v. Neuarenberg DK6.25011
    Coach v. Ziegelweiher6.25011
    Isolde v. Alten Hafen6.25011
    Karlo v. Linebrok6.25011
    Bautz v. d. Leda6.24022
    Hesta v. Linduri3.12011
    Mirco v. Linduri3.12011
    Ambra v. Struthof3.12011
    Cina v. d. Röthaller3.12011
    Aron v. Averbeck3.12011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund3.12011
    Maika v. Wiken3.12011
    Gina v. Roonstein3.12011
    Asta v. Averbeck3.12011
    Tina v. d. Bilsbek3.12011
    Gora v. Linebrok3.12011
    Fara v. Bussenhof3.12011
    Artos v. d. Schirmkiefer3.12011
    Nougat KS v. Hege-Haus DK3.12011
    Arco v. Backemeer3.12011
    Ando v. Birkengehege3.12011
    Arras v. Eikenloh3.12011
    Westfalen's Birka3.12011
    Meika v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Joy KS v. Hege-Haus DK3.12011
    Amor v. Butendieks3.12011
    Gera v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Horrik v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Igor v. Linebrok3.12011
    Quent v. Wittekind DK3.12011
    Henk v. Huntetal3.12011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Perro Nelha3.12011
    Fee v. Alten Hafen3.12011
    Aline KS v. Schwarzen Adler DK3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s