Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Becca v. Silberthal
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Becca v. Silberthal
    COI 5 gen: 0.195%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Cando Bavaria and Dam Janka v. Fliethbachthal
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 1.953%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)70
    Ancestor Loss-8
    Ancestor Loss in %112.90 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Janka v. Fliethbachthal50.00011
    Cando Bavaria50.00011
    Arco v. Backemeer28.120211
    Fee v. Fliethbachtal25.00011
    Gina L v. Rodekopp25.00011
    Nostra De Wynen25.00011
    Jesko v. Heek25.00011
    Fritz v. Kiekenbruch25.00011
    Erlo De Wynen12.50011
    Basko v. Alt-Hümmling12.50011
    Cora v. Heek12.50011
    Gilla De Wynen12.50011
    Hardy v. Paradies12.50011
    Hakon v. Forstgarten12.50011
    Basco v. Matzental12.50011
    Anke v. Keenmoor12.50011
    Elsbeth v. Rodekopp12.50011
    Dascha v. Fliethbachtal12.50011
    Dina v. Forstgarten6.25011
    Immo De Wynen6.25011
    Karlo v. Linebrok6.25011
    Dele v. Paradies6.25011
    Cent v. Hasselbach6.25011
    Aika v. Rodekopp6.25011
    Euro v. Blumenhof6.25011
    Esko v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Anka v. Birkenhaus6.25011
    Samson v. Linduri6.25011
    Anka v. Heek6.25011
    Aischa v. Heek6.25011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp6.25011
    Isko v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Rachel De Wynen6.25011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land6.25011
    Hazel De Wynen6.25011
    Benja v. Fliethbachtal6.25011
    Igor v. Linebrok6.24022
    Asta v. Averbeck6.24022
    Xandra v. Lönsstein6.24022
    Aika v. Buchwald3.12011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Unda v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Boss v. Silbersee3.12011
    Orlo v. d. Overbecker Mühle3.12011
    Bonny v. Brückhof3.12011
    Fanny De Wynen3.12011
    Diwa v. Kampstüh3.12011
    Dolly v. Lossetal3.12011
    Bautz v. d. Leda3.12011
    Jako v. Fasanenhof3.12011
    Ass v. d. Schlei3.12011
    Freya v. Steinroden3.12011
    Bob v. Zent-hof3.12011
    Tanja De Wynen3.12011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen3.12011
    Cai Holsatia3.12011
    Cäsar v. Elsternkamp3.12011
    Perro Nelha3.12011
    Bryka v.d.Röthaller3.12011
    Astor v. Rothen Hahn3.12011
    Esko Vun'N Wischhoff3.12011
    Annett v. Paradies3.12011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Cora v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Aury v. Waidbosch3.12011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Unda v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Hesta v. Linduri3.12011
    Gora v. Linebrok3.12011
    Utz v. Lönsstein3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s