Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Ina v. Ammerbachtal
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Ina v. Ammerbachtal
    COI 5 gen: 1.050%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Theo v. d. Schmiede and Dam Flocke v. Rehbrunn
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 2.539%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 4.688%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)72
    Ancestor Loss-10
    Ancestor Loss in %116.13 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Elli v. Heek50.00011
    Echo v. Luerwald50.00011
    Flocke v. Rehbrunn50.00011
    Theo v. d. Schmiede50.00011
    Westfalen's Chef37.500211
    Pino v. Kampstüh25.00011
    Quentin v. Wasserplatz25.00011
    Cosima v. Luerwald25.00011
    Daisy v. Schönrain25.00011
    Anka v. Heek25.00011
    Enni v. Fliethbachtal25.00011
    Gauner v. Stockey25.00011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde21.8703111
    Osca Aus Grupilinga18.750211
    Kira v. Tillplatz18.750211
    Asta v. Averbeck12.50011
    Herman v. Schatzrain12.50011
    Laika v. Kampstüh12.50011
    Arras v. Eikenloh12.50011
    Kascha v. Wasserplatz12.50011
    Ivan v. d. Schmiede12.50011
    Bessy v. Schönrain12.50011
    Zappe v. Schlemminer Forst12.50011
    Igor v. Linebrok12.50011
    Dascha v. Fliethbachtal12.50011
    Laura v. Poppenforst12.490312
    Dana v. Tillplatz9.370211
    Arco v. Backemeer9.370211
    Solojäger's Laura9.370211
    Lukas v. Linduri6.25011
    Freia v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Artus v. Elztal6.25011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern6.25011
    Dag v. Betzloh6.25011
    Dina v. Schatzrain6.25011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Esta v. d. Schmiede6.25011
    Beste v. Hegholz6.25011
    Xorro De Wynen6.25011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg6.25011
    Blitz v. Rottenanger6.25011
    Bautz v. d. Leda6.25011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Archibald v. d. Segeberger Heide6.25011
    Assel v. Jürgenstorf6.25011
    Elfe v. Linebrok6.25011
    Karlo v. Linebrok6.25011
    Benja v. Fliethbachtal6.25011
    Osca v. Bärenhorst6.24022
    Jerome De Wynen6.24022
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek3.12011
    Gora v. Linebrok3.12011
    Graf v. Silbersee3.12011
    Alba v. Immenhof3.12011
    Gitta v. Lossetal3.12011
    Jako v. Fasanenhof3.12011
    Pascha v. Elbufer3.12011
    Aspe v. Betzloh3.12011
    Alka v. Erlesberg3.12011
    Bella v. Hanauer Land3.12011
    Chris v. d. Schmiede3.12011
    Basko v. Bucheneck3.12011
    Aury v. Waidbosch3.12011
    Perro Nelha3.12011
    Elch v. Jägerkreuz3.12011
    Hesta v. Linduri3.12011
    Graf Nelha3.12011
    Assi v. Hegholz3.12011
    Bonny v. Brückhof3.12011
    Olly v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Natja v. d. Holzheide3.12011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s