Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Gringo v. Wolfethal
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Gringo v. Wolfethal
    COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Timmi v. Buchheim and Dam Ira v. d. Edelesse
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 1.562%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)57
    Ancestor Loss5
    Ancestor Loss in %91.94 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Timmi v. Buchheim50.00011
    Ira v. d. Edelesse50.00011
    Frieda v. Wolfethal25.00011
    Orvett v. Buchheim25.00011
    Basko v. Aartal25.00011
    Cicero v. Eulenspiegel25.00011
    Basca v. Mühbrooker Meer12.50011
    Dagobert v. Hege-Haus DK12.50011
    Locke v. Buchheim12.50011
    Axel v. Murner See12.50011
    Isolde v. Alten Hafen12.50011
    Ayla A. d. Holzland12.50011
    Rocky v. Neuarenberg DK12.50011
    Faust v. d. Mainauen12.50011
    Greif v. Reitbach9.370211
    Fara v. Bussenhof6.25011
    Erle v. d. Segeberger Heide6.25011
    Nougat KS v. Hege-Haus DK6.25011
    Grandl De Wynen6.25011
    Joy KS v. Hege-Haus DK6.25011
    Arco v. Backemeer6.25011
    Ando v. Birkengehege6.25011
    Fee v. Alten Hafen6.25011
    Foks v. Langer-Rau6.25011
    Egon v. Buchheim6.25011
    Quent v. Wittekind DK6.25011
    Aline KS v. Schwarzen Adler DK6.25011
    Bara v.d. Mainauen6.25011
    Horneth v. Buchheim6.25011
    Hanno v. Emsdeich6.25011
    Hakon v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Arko v. d. Seewiese3.12011
    Arras v. Eschbach3.12011
    Asja v. Alten Hafen3.12011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern3.12011
    Debby v. Emsdeich3.12011
    Anke v. Keenmoor3.12011
    Distel v.d. Segeberger Heide3.12011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Rika v. Linduri3.12011
    Dolly v. Langer-Rau3.12011
    Lukas v. Wittekind (DK)3.12011
    Laika v. Linduri3.12011
    Hedda v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Westfalen's Chef3.12011
    Rivkah v. Buchheim3.12011
    Era v. Wittekind (DK)3.12011
    Xanthippe De Wynen3.12011
    Conrad v. Birkengehege3.12011
    Caesar v. Holdergrund3.12011
    Unken v. Buchheim3.12011
    Wassow Rothenuffeln (DK)3.12011
    Dandy v. Roonstein3.12011
    Dean v. d. Schmiede3.12011
    Centa v. Kirschenberg3.12011
    Achill v.d. Krakequelle3.12011
    Era v. d. Wacht im Walde (DK)3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s