Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Holly v. Adewacht
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Holly v. Adewacht
    COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Cuno v. Freijäger and Dam Bea v. Wiesenbach
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.977%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)61
    Ancestor Loss1
    Ancestor Loss in %98.39 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Bea v. Wiesenbach50.00011
    Cuno v. Freijäger50.00011
    Freya v. Adewacht25.00011
    Andra v. Freijäger25.00011
    Karlo v. d. Jade25.00011
    Gustav v. Forstkamp25.00011
    Detje v. Adewacht12.50011
    Biene v. Forstkamp12.50011
    Westfalen's Cuno12.50011
    Kuno v. d. Horstbüschen12.50011
    Joy v. Eulenspiegel12.50011
    Gero v. Reitbach12.50011
    Antje v. Horum12.50011
    Hunter v. d. Röthaller12.50011
    Kira v. Tillplatz6.25011
    Arras v. Eschbach6.25011
    Quino Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Castor v. Bakumer Esch6.25011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Cody v. Emsdeich6.25011
    Cäthe v. Eulenspiegel6.25011
    Este v. Linebrok6.25011
    Bea v. Calveslage6.25011
    Rika v. Linduri6.25011
    Boss v. Mellin6.25011
    Emmy v. d. Horstbüschen6.25011
    Cina v. d. Röthaller6.25011
    Arko v. Deutschen Orden6.25011
    Assi v. Forstkamp6.25011
    Dean v. d. Horstbüschen6.25011
    Bautz v. d. Leda6.24022
    Arco v. Backemeer3.12011
    Quell v. Huntetal3.12011
    Karlo v. Linebrok3.12011
    Artos v. d. Schirmkiefer3.12011
    Hella v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Farah v. Hilkefeld3.12011
    Gina v. Roonstein3.12011
    Meika v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Cora v. Bonrechtern3.12011
    Isolde v. Alten Hafen3.12011
    Eddy v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Hasko v. Linebrok3.12011
    Bea v. d.Manningaburg3.12011
    Wanda v. d. Binnenelbe3.12011
    Mira v. Linduri3.12011
    Solojäger's Laura3.12011
    Arras v. Eikenloh3.12011
    Westfalen's Chef3.12011
    Dana v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Gitta v. Buchheim3.12011
    Nöck v. Wiken3.12011
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Lord v. Jurawald3.12011
    Moni v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde3.12011
    Ondra Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund3.12011
    Dolf v. Mönchsbrunnen3.12011
    Ondra v. Stockey3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s