Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Beere v. d. Tüllheide
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Beere v. d. Tüllheide
    COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Boss v. d. Wallsbek and Dam Birka v. d. Kiebitzheide
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.977%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 1.660%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)61
    Ancestor Loss1
    Ancestor Loss in %98.39 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Boss v. d. Wallsbek50.00011
    Birka v. d. Kiebitzheide50.00011
    Westfalen's Deibel25.00011
    Hanna v. Kemmberg25.00011
    Musika v. Buchheim25.00011
    Gustav v. Forstkamp25.00011
    Anton v. Steinbachtal12.50011
    Hunter v. d. Röthaller12.50011
    Biene v. Forstkamp12.50011
    Elsa v. Kemmberg12.50011
    Io v. Buchheim12.50011
    Horneth v. Buchheim12.50011
    Lena v. Heesenhof12.50011
    Ajax v. Eschbach12.50011
    Greif v. Reitbach9.370211
    Cora v. Mittelrhein6.25011
    Hanno v. Emsdeich6.25011
    Assi v. Forstkamp6.25011
    Quino Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Westfalen's Cuno6.25011
    Leonie v. Alten Hafen6.25011
    Unken v. Buchheim6.25011
    Cina v. d. Röthaller6.25011
    Foks v. Langer-Rau6.25011
    Anka v. Rothsee6.25011
    Gina v. Roonstein6.25011
    Caesar v. Holdergrund6.25011
    Gesche v. Burghöft6.25011
    Castor v. Bakumer Esch6.25011
    Arras v. Eikenloh6.25011
    Dolf v. Mönchsbrunnen3.12011
    Mirco v. Linduri3.12011
    Rika v. Linduri3.12011
    Arras v. Eschbach3.12011
    Kastor v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Ondra Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Mira v. Linduri3.12011
    Arko v. Deutschen Orden3.12011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Rena v. Elbufer3.12011
    Wanda v. d. Binnenelbe3.12011
    Dean v. d. Schmiede3.12011
    Heido v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Debby v. Emsdeich3.12011
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Basko v. Tannengarten3.12011
    Anja v. Veybach3.12011
    Freya v. Roonstein3.12011
    Kira v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Elch v. Rodekopp3.12011
    Bonny v. Erdinger Moos3.12011
    Cäsar v. Elsternkamp3.12011
    Ojah v. d. Drachheide3.12011
    Artos v. d. Schirmkiefer3.12011
    Cora v. Deutschen Orden3.12011
    Dolly v. Langer-Rau3.12011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Lucie Nelha3.12011
    Meika v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Lukas v. Linduri3.12011
    Nixe v. Buchheim3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s