Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Haska v. d. Schmiede
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Haska v. d. Schmiede
    COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Attila v. Steigerwald and Dam Yinka v. d. Schmiede
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 1.172%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)61
    Ancestor Loss1
    Ancestor Loss in %98.39 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Yinka v. d. Schmiede50.00011
    Attila v. Steigerwald50.00011
    Katta v. d. Schmiede25.00011
    Vasko v. d. Hafkesdell25.00011
    Witti v. d. Schmiede25.00011
    Irwisch v. Poppenforst25.00011
    Zoff v. Poppenforst12.50011
    Falko v. Forst Ostenwalde12.50011
    Lindemann's Akita12.50011
    Suko v. d. Hafkesdell12.50011
    Daisy v. Schönrain12.50011
    Etzel Aus Moor Und Heide12.50011
    Vyko v. Sämmenhof12.50011
    Nixe v. Wasserplatz12.50011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Basco v. Matzental6.25011
    Bea v.d. Schorlemer'schen Rentei6.25011
    Bessy v. Schönrain6.25011
    Ussa v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Westfalen's Artus6.25011
    Gera v. d. Hafkesdell6.25011
    Hedda v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Arras v. d. Segeberger Heide6.25011
    Dean v. d. Schmiede6.25011
    Castor v. Bakumer Esch6.25011
    Elli v. Heek6.25011
    Kascha v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Anton v. d. Klosterwiese6.25011
    Ivan v. d. Schmiede6.25011
    Racker v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Laura v. Poppenforst6.24022
    Cora v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Lukas v. Linduri3.12011
    Freia v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Aloe v.d. Schorlemer'schen Rentei3.12011
    Blitz v. Rottenanger3.12011
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Mira v. Linduri3.12011
    Graf Nelha3.12011
    Heido v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Dina v. d. Himmerner Heide3.12011
    Queen v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Dargo v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Gauner v. Stockey3.12011
    Anka v. Heek3.12011
    Bessy v. d. Schmiede3.12011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald3.12011
    Dag v. Betzloh3.12011
    Gera v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Kira v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Westfalen's Chef3.12011
    Esta v. d. Schmiede3.12011
    Bautz v. d. Leda3.12011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide3.12011
    Asta v. Pamesgrub3.12011
    Aury v. Waidbosch3.12011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land3.12011
    Orka v. d. Drachheide3.12011
    Arras v. Eschbach3.12011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s