Pedigree Analysis

Generations

Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Thanehøjs Anna

This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

COI Calculation - Thanehøjs Anna

COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!

COI Calculation - Sire Pico v. d. Horstbüschen and Dam Asta v. Kumpfmühl

Sire: COI 5 gen: 1.367%    very very low    Calculate COI again

Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.586%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)

This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

# of dogs
Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)61
Ancestor Loss1
Ancestor Loss in %98.39 %

Contributing Ancestors

AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
Pico v. d. Horstbüschen50.00011
Asta v. Kumpfmühl50.00011
Merlin v. d. Haagerleiten25.00011
Agi v. Minatal25.00011
Neele v.d. Horstbüschen25.00011
Arco v. Hautzerfeld25.00011
Kim v. d. Horstbüschen12.50011
Lucky v. Heesenhof12.50011
Karlo v. d. Haagerleiten12.50011
Dina v. Ziegelweiher12.50011
Lexa v. d. Haagerleiten12.50011
Anton v. Steinbachtal12.50011
Boss v. Labertal12.50011
Yra v. Minatal12.50011
Tina v. Minatal6.25011
Anka v. Rothsee6.25011
Centa v. Ohetal6.25011
Emmy v. d. Horstbüschen6.25011
Sinus Frankundfrei6.25011
Hanko v. Wasserplatz6.25011
Cora v. Mittelrhein6.25011
Uhl v. Poppenforst6.25011
Westfalen's Birka6.25011
Ines v. d. Haagerleiten6.25011
Dean v. d. Horstbüschen6.25011
Westfalen's Cuno6.25011
Aikfried v. Murner See6.25011
Hanno v. Emsdeich6.25011
Drago v. Rodekopp6.25011
Clara v. d. Wendlinger Seerose6.25011
Kira v. Tillplatz6.24022
Foks v. Langer-Rau3.12011
Debby v. Emsdeich3.12011
Bea v. d.Manningaburg3.12011
Charly v. Kraxberg3.12011
Quell v. Huntetal3.12011
Nora v. Minatal3.12011
Bianka v. d. Wendlinger Seerose3.12011
Elch v. Hanauer Land3.12011
Ivo v. Lönsstein3.12011
Laura v. Poppenforst3.12011
Elch v. Rodekopp3.12011
Birke v. Stammberg3.12011
Aco v. d. Wendlinger Seerose3.12011
Eddy v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
Gauner v. Stockey3.12011
Cora v. Deutschen Orden3.12011
Bella v. Lamprechtshausner Langhaar3.12011
Osca Aus Grupilinga3.12011
Hedda v. Lönsstein3.12011
Riecke Frankundfrei3.12011
Greif v. Zellergarten3.12011
Kastor v. Wasserplatz3.12011
Grandl De Wynen3.12011
Rena v. Elbufer3.12011
Aika v. Rodekopp3.12011
Benno v. Pfarrerwald3.12011
Greif v. Reitbach3.12011
Benno v. Brückhof3.12011
Arras v. d. Segeberger Heide3.12011
Moni v. Tillplatz3.12011
Last updated Tuesday 19 March 2019 08:59 CET


I have 🍪s