Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Anne v. d. Hasenheide
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Anne v. d. Hasenheide
    COI 5 gen: 1.270%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Baldur v. Lönsstein and Dam Biene v. Birkenhaus
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)57
    Ancestor Loss5
    Ancestor Loss in %91.94 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Biene v. Birkenhaus50.00011
    Baldur v. Lönsstein50.00011
    Cora v. Bärenhorst25.00011
    Hektor v. d. Lindenhöhe25.00011
    Cita v. Winterberg25.00011
    Enno Holsatia25.00011
    Dina v. Steinroden15.620211
    Ute v. Lönsstein12.50011
    Unda v. Lönsstein12.50011
    Grandel v. d. Lindenhöhe12.50011
    Morro v. Feuersang12.50011
    Bill v. Bessingslust12.50011
    Groll v. Reutherspfad12.50011
    Esko Vun'N Wischhoff12.50011
    Illa v. Feuersang9.370211
    Zent v. Feuersang9.36033
    Heidi v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Cessie v. Holundereck6.25011
    Biene v. Ringofen6.25011
    Gina Dankwarder Ode6.25011
    Arco v. Reutherspfad6.25011
    Natter v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Birko v. Holsatia6.25011
    Bill v. Straufhain6.25011
    Citta v. Arlsberg6.25011
    Asta v. Werlacke6.25011
    Arko v. d. Waterkant6.25011
    Drauf v. d. Lindenhöhe6.25011
    Tasso v. Feuersang6.25011
    Bodo v. Weserstrand6.25011
    Gambo v. Werlacke6.25011
    Asta v. Steinleite6.24022
    Donar v. Alten Zollhaus3.12011
    Bona v. Hohen Geroldseck3.12011
    Asti v. Windenhof3.12011
    Manto v. d. Düsterbeck3.12011
    Amsel v. Maistieg3.12011
    Donar v. Turkenweg3.12011
    Assi v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Baron v. Rehsprung3.12011
    Diva v. d. Uhrau3.12011
    Dingo v. Spitzberg3.12011
    Bobby v. Leefeld3.12011
    Cora v. Waldsteinberg3.12011
    Birko v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Aero v. Ernst-August-Pold.3.12011
    Juri v. Wolfsgrund3.12011
    Cilli v. Berghof3.12011
    Ulla Frankundfrei3.12011
    Certa v. d. Frankenburg3.12011
    Arko v. Fischerwinkel3.12011
    Falk v. Waldsteinberg3.12011
    Sandra v. Feuersang3.12011
    Brack v. d. Kautenback3.12011
    York Frankundfrei3.12011
    Amsel v. Windenhof3.12011
    Alf v. Schinterkogel3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s