Pedigree Analysis

Generations

Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Sjørslev's Miss Tara

This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

COI Calculation - Sjørslev's Miss Tara

COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!

COI Calculation - Sire Bullenbarger's Ari and Dam Sjørslev's Jenni

Sire: COI 5 gen: 1.562%    very very low    Calculate COI again

Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)

This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

# of dogs
Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)59
Ancestor Loss3
Ancestor Loss in %95.16 %

Contributing Ancestors

AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
Sjørslev's Jenni50.00011
Bullenbarger's Ari50.00011
Sjørslev's China25.00011
Hanni v. Fliethbachtal25.00011
Boss v. Mellin25.00011
Hardy v. Heek25.00011
Soudo-Kay's Albert12.50011
Ondra v. Stockey12.50011
Asta v. Averbeck12.50011
Fee v. Fliethbachtal12.50011
Osca Aus Grupilinga12.50022
Greif v. Reitbach12.50011
Ando v. Hollbäck12.50011
Westfalen's Chef12.50011
Bine12.50011
Z Zapri6.25011
Kira v. Tillplatz6.25011
Pan6.25011
Dascha v. Fliethbachtal6.25011
Gusti v. Stockey6.25011
Arras v. Eschbach6.25011
Arko v. Fliethbachtal6.25011
Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern6.25011
Gitta v. d. Wallburg6.25011
Basko v. Alt-Hümmling6.25011
Anna Fan'E Swadde6.25011
Majk Od Hanusky6.25011
Rika v. Linduri6.25011
Aska v. Forstkamp6.25011
Solojäger's Laura6.24022
Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde6.24022
Dana v. Tillplatz3.12011
Anka v. Schönrain3.12011
Elch v. Hanauer Land3.12011
Bonny v. Brückhof3.12011
Benja v. Fliethbachtal3.12011
Dar Z Orlova Cs3.12011
Wysiwyg F Sønder Askjærs Leica3.12011
Alice v. Wiebusch3.12011
Gina v. Roonstein3.12011
Artos v. d. Schirmkiefer3.12011
Jakob v. Sämmenhof3.12011
Kata Od Hanusky3.12011
Evita v. Stockey3.12011
Arras v. Eikenloh3.12011
Meika v. Wasserplatz3.12011
Fuda Fan'E Swadde3.12011
Sak Fan'E Swadde3.12011
Elk v. Bärenhorst3.12011
Amsel v. Silbergrund3.12011
Alex v. Bannwald3.12011
Bautz v. d. Leda3.12011
Arco v. Backemeer3.12011
Gordon v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
Karlo v. Linebrok3.12011
Euro v. Blumenhof3.12011
Wysiwyg A Bertha3.12011
Lord Z Dubricske Skaly3.12011
Aischa v. Heek3.12011
Last updated Tuesday 19 March 2019 08:59 CET


I have 🍪s