Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Apollo v. Dürnbergteich
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Apollo v. Dürnbergteich
    COI 5 gen: 0.586%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Akim v. Rothsee and Dam Ascha v. Waldviertel Forst
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.977%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)72
    Ancestor Loss-10
    Ancestor Loss in %116.13 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Hella v. Nörderkamp50.00011
    Akim v. Rothsee50.00011
    Hanno v. Lönsstein50.00011
    Ascha v. Waldviertel Forst50.00011
    Groll v. Huntetal25.00011
    Elch v. Rodekopp25.00011
    Queen v. Wasserplatz25.00011
    Cora v. Deutschen Orden25.00011
    Victor v. Poppenforst25.00011
    Cora v. Linebrok25.00011
    Hedda v. Lönsstein12.50011
    Aika v. Rodekopp12.50011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp12.50011
    Quecke v. Haberland12.50011
    Herman v. Schatzrain12.50011
    Don v. Langer-Rau12.50011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land12.50011
    Kascha v. Wasserplatz12.50011
    Igor v. Perverberg12.50011
    Alexa v. Deutchen Orden12.50011
    Dina v. Schatzrain6.25011
    Lord v. Jurawald6.25011
    Laura v. Poppenforst6.25011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen6.25011
    Mona v. Haberland6.25011
    Xaver v. d. Binnenelbe6.25011
    Gera v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Orlo v. d. Overbecker Mühle6.25011
    Aika v. Buchwald6.25011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide6.25011
    Grille v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg6.25011
    Lukas v. Linduri6.25011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald6.25011
    Bautz v. d. Leda6.25011
    Aury v. Waidbosch6.25011
    Artus v. Elztal6.25011
    Cora v. Karwald6.25011
    Tanja De Wynen6.25011
    Gitta v. Buchheim6.25011
    Graf v. Silbersee6.24022
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide6.24022
    Jerome De Wynen6.24022
    Bruna v. Lönsstein6.24022
    Lessy v. Werlacke3.12011
    Alard v. d. Leda3.12011
    Caro v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Natja v. d. Holzheide3.12011
    Gwenda v. Jurawald3.12011
    Gitta v. Lossetal3.12011
    Ondra v. Lossetal3.12011
    Hesta v. Linduri3.12011
    Puro v. d. Faistenau3.12011
    Cliff v. Linduri3.12011
    Farah v. Minatal3.12011
    Bessi v. Winterberg3.12011
    Esko v. Mühlenberg3.12011
    Jolly De Wynen3.12011
    Dax Nelha3.12011
    Asco v. Holmesborn3.12011
    Cora v. Holmesborn3.12011
    Elch v. Jägerkreuz3.12011
    Bella v. Hanauer Land3.12011
    Distel v. Buchheim3.12011
    Olga v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Vulkan De Wynen3.12011
    Axel v. d. Lechmündung3.12011
    Kimo v. Haberland3.12011
    Jenka v. d. Overbecker Mühle3.12011
    Olly v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Alka v. Erlesberg3.12011
    Dolli v. d. Jagdhütte3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s