Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Horneth v. Holdergrund
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Horneth v. Holdergrund
    COI 5 gen: 1.562%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Thor v. Buchheim and Dam Dina v. Holdergrund
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 1.562%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 3.027%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)59
    Ancestor Loss3
    Ancestor Loss in %95.16 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Dina v. Holdergrund50.00011
    Thor v. Buchheim50.00011
    Angi v. Weiherhof25.00011
    Basko v. Aartal25.00011
    Hermes v. Buchheim25.00011
    Orvett v. Buchheim25.00011
    Caesar v. Holdergrund15.620211
    Unken v. Buchheim15.620211
    Orkan v. Linebrok12.50011
    Basca v. Mühbrooker Meer12.50011
    Gera v. Kirschenberg12.50011
    Locke v. Buchheim12.50011
    Axel v. Murner See12.50011
    Faust v. d. Mainauen12.50011
    Greif v. Reitbach9.370211
    Arthus v. Kandelwald6.25011
    Arko v. Deutschen Orden6.25011
    Heido v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Hanno v. Emsdeich6.25011
    Erle v. d. Segeberger Heide6.25011
    Lara v. Linebrok6.25011
    Nixe v. Buchheim6.25011
    Egon v. Buchheim6.25011
    Bonny v. Erdinger Moos6.25011
    Grandl De Wynen6.25011
    Horneth v. Buchheim6.25011
    Perle v. Buchheim6.25011
    Perro Nelha6.25011
    Foks v. Langer-Rau6.25011
    Bara v.d. Mainauen6.25011
    Solojäger's Granne3.12011
    Lord v. Jurawald3.12011
    Westfalen's Chef3.12011
    Achill v.d. Krakequelle3.12011
    Aiko v. Aischtal3.12011
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Xanthippe De Wynen3.12011
    Hanno v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Anka v. Deutschen Orden3.12011
    Distel v. Buchheim3.12011
    Dean v. d. Schmiede3.12011
    Hella v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Arko v. d. Seewiese3.12011
    Conrad v. Birkengehege3.12011
    Distel v.d. Segeberger Heide3.12011
    Dachs v. Wietensholt3.12011
    Centa v. Kirschenberg3.12011
    Debby v. Emsdeich3.12011
    Bautz v. d. Leda3.12011
    Gera v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Arras v. Eschbach3.12011
    Dolly v. Langer-Rau3.12011
    Rivkah v. Buchheim3.12011
    Bella v. Muggental3.12011
    Andra v. Buchheim3.12011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land3.12011
    Rika v. Linduri3.12011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Gitta v. Buchheim3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s