Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Uno v. d. Horstbüschen
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Uno v. d. Horstbüschen
    COI 5 gen: 2.344%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Hardy v. d. Wallburg and Dam Pia v. d. Horstbüschen
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 1.367%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)57
    Ancestor Loss5
    Ancestor Loss in %91.94 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Hardy v. d. Wallburg50.00011
    Pia v. d. Horstbüschen50.00011
    Neele v.d. Horstbüschen25.00011
    Arco v. Hautzerfeld25.00011
    Hektor v. Emsdeich25.00011
    Vroni v. d. Hafkesdell25.00011
    Greif v. Reitbach15.620211
    Debby v. Emsdeich15.620211
    Lucky v. Heesenhof12.50011
    Dina v. Ziegelweiher12.50011
    Anton v. Steinbachtal12.50011
    Falko v. Forst Ostenwalde12.50011
    Suko v. d. Hafkesdell12.50011
    Kim v. d. Horstbüschen12.50011
    Quell v. Huntetal9.370211
    Kira v. Tillplatz9.36033
    Gera v. d. Hafkesdell6.25011
    Westfalen's Birka6.25011
    Emmy v. d. Horstbüschen6.25011
    Westfalen's Cuno6.25011
    Westfalen's Artus6.25011
    Cora v. Mittelrhein6.25011
    Aikfried v. Murner See6.25011
    Hanno v. Emsdeich6.25011
    Farah v. Hilkefeld6.25011
    Arras v. d. Segeberger Heide6.25011
    Arras v. Eschbach6.25011
    Rika v. Linduri6.25011
    Anka v. Rothsee6.25011
    Dean v. d. Horstbüschen6.25011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Cora v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Moni v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Cora v. Deutschen Orden3.12011
    Nimrods Enno3.12011
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Maika v. Wiken3.12011
    Gauner v. Stockey3.12011
    Kastor v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund3.12011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide3.12011
    Gina v. Roonstein3.12011
    Rena v. Elbufer3.12011
    Dolly Nelha3.12011
    Arras v. Eikenloh3.12011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald3.12011
    Dargo v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Grandl De Wynen3.12011
    Foks v. Langer-Rau3.12011
    Bautz v. d. Leda3.12011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land3.12011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Laura v. Poppenforst3.12011
    Bea v. d.Manningaburg3.12011
    Henk v. Huntetal3.12011
    Eddy v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Elch v. Rodekopp3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s