Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - July v. Wietensholt
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - July v. Wietensholt
    COI 5 gen: 0.977%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Elvis v. Horum and Dam Hummel v. Wietensholt
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 3.516%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)58
    Ancestor Loss4
    Ancestor Loss in %93.55 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Hummel v. Wietensholt50.00011
    Elvis v. Horum50.00011
    Fanny v. Wietensholt25.00011
    Hardy v. Heek25.00011
    Wilco v. Huntetal25.00011
    Bea v. Calveslage25.00011
    Karlo v. Linebrok12.50011
    Greif v. Reitbach12.50011
    Asta v. Averbeck12.50011
    Quendy v. Huntetal12.50011
    Hanno v. Lönsstein12.50011
    Falko v. Forst Ostenwalde12.50011
    Delta v. Lockfehn12.50011
    Cora v. Bonrechtern12.50011
    Bautz v. d. Leda12.490312
    Elch v. Hanauer Land9.36033
    Akko v. Loher Schwarten6.25011
    Arras v. d. Segeberger Heide6.25011
    Amor v. Butendieks6.25011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Arras v. Eschbach6.25011
    Henk v. Huntetal6.25011
    Maika v. Wiken6.25011
    Perro Nelha6.25011
    Amsel v. Hahnentange6.25011
    Gera v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Gora v. Linebrok6.25011
    Ambra v. Struthof6.25011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern6.25011
    Rika v. Linduri6.25011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg6.25011
    Groll v. Huntetal3.12011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund3.12011
    Gordon v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Laura v. Poppenforst3.12011
    Henry v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Orka v. Linduri3.12011
    Graf v. Silbersee3.12011
    Hella v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Gitta v. Lossetal3.12011
    Anka v. Schönrain3.12011
    Fenja v. Rethwischer Moor3.12011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide3.12011
    Ingo v. Lossetal3.12011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Alice v. Wiebusch3.12011
    Gina v. Roonstein3.12011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald3.12011
    Fango v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Solojäger's Granne3.12011
    Laika v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Lona v. Linduri3.12011
    Arras v. Eikenloh3.12011
    Andra v. Siegbogen3.12011
    Bruna v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Eddy v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Diana v. Linduri3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s