Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Antje lll v. Buchheim
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Antje lll v. Buchheim
    COI 5 gen: 1.758%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Thor v. Buchheim and Dam Raizza v. Buchheim
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.195%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)56
    Ancestor Loss6
    Ancestor Loss in %90.32 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Raizza v. Buchheim50.00011
    Thor v. Buchheim50.00011
    Schorsch v. d. Schmiede25.00011
    Jazz v. Buchheim25.00011
    Orvett v. Buchheim25.00011
    Basko v. Aartal25.00011
    Greif v. Reitbach15.620321
    Faust v. d. Mainauen12.50011
    Jessy v. d. Schmiede12.50011
    Etzel v. Buchheim12.50011
    Axel v. Murner See12.50011
    Basca v. Mühbrooker Meer12.50011
    Locke v. Buchheim12.50011
    Leonie v. Alten Hafen12.50011
    Boss v. Mellin12.50011
    Westfalen's Chef9.370211
    Grandl De Wynen6.25011
    Egon v. Buchheim6.25011
    Etzel Aus Moor Und Heide6.25011
    Ondra v. Stockey6.25011
    Bara v.d. Mainauen6.25011
    Horneth v. Buchheim6.25011
    Basko v. Tannengarten6.25011
    Hanno v. Emsdeich6.25011
    Katteneck's Daisy6.25011
    Foks v. Langer-Rau6.25011
    Erle v. d. Segeberger Heide6.25011
    Anja v. Veybach6.25011
    Nesta v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Rika v. Linduri6.24022
    Arras v. Eschbach6.24022
    Dean v. d. Schmiede6.24022
    Jule v. Linduri3.12011
    Milla v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Caesar v. Holdergrund3.12011
    Dolly v. Langer-Rau3.12011
    Eddy v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Rivkah v. Buchheim3.12011
    Ussa v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Gusti v. Stockey3.12011
    Arko v. Fliethbachtal3.12011
    Xanthippe De Wynen3.12011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Achill v.d. Krakequelle3.12011
    Castor v. Bakumer Esch3.12011
    Brack v. Kampstüh3.12011
    Arko v. d. Seewiese3.12011
    Kascha v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Debby v. Emsdeich3.12011
    Aenne v. Stockey3.12011
    Kira v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Conrad v. Birkengehege3.12011
    Distel v.d. Segeberger Heide3.12011
    Unken v. Buchheim3.12011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern3.12011
    Centa v. Kirschenberg3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s