Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Andra v. Wuddelhoff
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Andra v. Wuddelhoff
    COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Esko v. Huntetal and Dam Britt Aus Grupilinga
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 3.125%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 1.172%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)58
    Ancestor Loss4
    Ancestor Loss in %93.55 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Esko v. Huntetal50.00011
    Britt Aus Grupilinga50.00011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp25.00011
    Chico v. Borgkamp25.00011
    Esta v. Ruthenstrom25.00011
    Laika v. d. Waterkant25.00011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen12.50011
    Ines v. d. Waterkant12.50011
    Alin v. Ruthenstrom12.50011
    Esko Vun'N Wischhoff12.50011
    Ajax v. Klockhof12.50022
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg12.50011
    Bob v. d. Schlei12.50011
    Xari v. Wolfsgrund12.50011
    Elvi v. Lossetal12.50011
    Wido v. Schwege9.370211
    Anke v. Birkenhof6.25011
    Rasso v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Flocke v. d. Tränke6.25011
    Olli v. d. Böckelsburg6.25011
    Cilly v. Waterkant6.25011
    Arrak v. Hagenpolder6.25011
    Sonja v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Biene v. Ringofen6.25011
    Ingo v. Schadwalde6.25011
    Alic v. Basbek6.25011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Cora v. Tannenkamp6.25011
    Birko v. Holsatia6.25011
    Assi v. Nörderkamp6.24022
    Bob v. d. Falloh6.24022
    Cilli v. Berghof3.12011
    Asso v. Stubben3.12011
    Cita v. d. Tränke3.12011
    Mary v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Manto v. d. Düsterbeck3.12011
    Bodo v. Weserstrand3.12011
    Nadja v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Dina v. Steinroden3.12011
    Basko v. Neuenhof3.12011
    Bona v. Hohen Geroldseck3.12011
    Immo v. d. Binnenelbe3.12011
    Natter v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Quinti v. Schwege3.12011
    Gabi v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Fango v. Waterkant3.12011
    Zent v. Feuersang3.12011
    Elko v. Turkenweg3.12011
    Cent Graf v. Amelsbüren3.12011
    Biene v. d. Nordheide3.12011
    Longa Fortuna3.12011
    Eske v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Cilla v. d. Holzheide3.12011
    Morro v. Feuersang3.12011
    Golo Dankwarder Ode3.12011
    Lissi v.d Böckelsburg3.12011
    Alf Chamavia3.12011
    Jutta v. Odisheim3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s