Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Ida v. Blanken-Diek
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Ida v. Blanken-Diek
    COI 5 gen: 0.195%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Basko v. Aartal and Dam Frieda v. Blanken-Diek
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 1.562%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)60
    Ancestor Loss2
    Ancestor Loss in %96.77 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Basko v. Aartal50.00011
    Frieda v. Blanken-Diek50.00011
    Max v. Paradies25.00011
    Alfa v. Blanken-Diek25.00011
    Axel v. Murner See25.00011
    Basca v. Mühbrooker Meer25.00011
    Hexe v. Paradies12.50011
    Grandl De Wynen12.50011
    Westfalen's Artus12.50011
    Greif v. Reitbach12.50011
    Cleo v. d. Meesenburg12.50011
    Aron v. Averbeck12.50011
    Erle v. d. Segeberger Heide12.50011
    Foks v. Langer-Rau12.50011
    Dele v. Paradies9.370211
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern6.25011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg6.25011
    Xanthippe De Wynen6.25011
    Conrad v. Birkengehege6.25011
    Dargo v. d. Hafkesdell6.25011
    Dean v. d. Schmiede6.25011
    Rika v. Linduri6.25011
    Arras v. Eschbach6.25011
    Dolly v. Langer-Rau6.25011
    Arko v. d. Seewiese6.25011
    Gerry v. Paradies6.25011
    Kira v. Tillplatz6.25011
    Isko v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Ganna v. Hasenkamp6.25011
    Distel v.d. Segeberger Heide6.25011
    Bautz v. d. Leda6.24022
    Anka v. Schönrain3.12011
    Arco v. Backemeer3.12011
    Unda v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Mando De Wynen3.12011
    Cäsar v. Elsternkamp3.12011
    Basko v. Forst Ostenwalde3.12011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Pom v. Minatal3.12011
    Gordon v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Aury v. Waidbosch3.12011
    Kora v. Königsfeld3.12011
    Orion De Wynen3.12011
    Bessy v. d. Schmiede3.12011
    Horrik v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Cora v. Karwald3.12011
    Pascal De Wynen3.12011
    Annett v. Paradies3.12011
    Baco v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund3.12011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land3.12011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide3.12011
    Gina v. Roonstein3.12011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald3.12011
    Finja v. Hasenkamp3.12011
    Dana v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Iska v. Werneck3.12011
    Laika v. Linduri3.12011
    Alice v. Wiebusch3.12011
    Arras v. Eikenloh3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s