Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Fährmann v. Wolfethal
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Fährmann v. Wolfethal
    COI 5 gen: 0.195%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Calle v. d. Reutereiche and Dam Ira v. d. Edelesse
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)57
    Ancestor Loss5
    Ancestor Loss in %91.94 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Ira v. d. Edelesse50.00011
    Calle v. d. Reutereiche50.00011
    Frieda v. Wolfethal25.00011
    Cicero v. Eulenspiegel25.00011
    Heinz v. Rodekopp25.00011
    Bessy v.d. Reutereiche25.00011
    Andra v.d. Reutereiche12.50011
    Isolde v. Alten Hafen12.50011
    Hektor v. Emsdeich12.50011
    Dagobert v. Hege-Haus DK12.50011
    Elsbeth v. Rodekopp12.50011
    Ayla A. d. Holzland12.50011
    Egon v. Buchheim12.50011
    Rocky v. Neuarenberg DK12.50011
    Aline KS v. Schwarzen Adler DK6.25011
    Aika v. Rodekopp6.25011
    Debby v. Emsdeich6.25011
    Ando v. Birkengehege6.25011
    Ira v. Stockey6.25011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land6.25011
    Fee v. Alten Hafen6.25011
    Fara v. Bussenhof6.25011
    Nougat KS v. Hege-Haus DK6.25011
    Joy KS v. Hege-Haus DK6.25011
    Samson v. Linduri6.25011
    Westfalen's Chef6.25011
    Rivkah v. Buchheim6.25011
    Quent v. Wittekind DK6.25011
    Arco v. Backemeer6.25011
    Greif v. Reitbach6.25011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga6.24022
    Dandy v. Roonstein3.12011
    Tanja De Wynen3.12011
    Herman v. Schatzrain3.12011
    Hakon v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Arras v. Eschbach3.12011
    Asja v. Alten Hafen3.12011
    Rika v. Linduri3.12011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Anke v. Keenmoor3.12011
    Laika v. Linduri3.12011
    Hedda v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Lukas v. Wittekind (DK)3.12011
    Aury v. Waidbosch3.12011
    Kira v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Asmus v. d. Segeberger Heide3.12011
    Era v. Wittekind (DK)3.12011
    Hesta v. Linduri3.12011
    Farah v. Hilkefeld3.12011
    Quell v. Huntetal3.12011
    Wassow Rothenuffeln (DK)3.12011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Lilli v. Buchheim3.12011
    Era v. d. Wacht im Walde (DK)3.12011
    Aika v. Buchwald3.12011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern3.12011
    Gusti v. Stockey3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s