Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Amke v. d. Wollf's Höhle
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Amke v. d. Wollf's Höhle
    COI 5 gen: 0.195%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Freddy v. Hollbäck and Dam Finja v. Horum
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 1.172%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)61
    Ancestor Loss1
    Ancestor Loss in %98.39 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Freddy v. Hollbäck50.00011
    Finja v. Horum50.00011
    Max v. Wuddelhof25.00011
    Cilly v. Hollbäck25.00011
    Elvis v. Horum25.00011
    Indra v. d. Edelesse25.00011
    Sepp Aus Grupilinga12.50011
    Coach v. Ziegelweiher12.50011
    Janka v. Wuddelhof12.50011
    Aska v. Forstkamp12.50011
    Wilco v. Huntetal12.50011
    Bea v. Calveslage12.50011
    Cicero v. Eulenspiegel12.50011
    Frieda v. Wolfethal12.50011
    Ayla A. d. Holzland6.25011
    Cora v. Bonrechtern6.25011
    Castor v. d. Hirtenburg6.25011
    Quendy v. Huntetal6.25011
    Rocky v. Neuarenberg DK6.25011
    Gerrit v. Wuddelhof6.25011
    Karlo v. Linebrok6.25011
    Artos v. d. Schirmkiefer6.25011
    Eddy v. Riehenbusch6.25011
    Paula Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Aron v. Averbeck6.25011
    Meika v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Hanno v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Dagobert v. Hege-Haus DK6.25011
    Westfalen's Birka6.25011
    Isolde v. Alten Hafen6.25011
    Arco v. Backemeer6.24022
    Nougat KS v. Hege-Haus DK3.12011
    Amor v. Butendieks3.12011
    Maika v. Wiken3.12011
    Gora v. Linebrok3.12011
    Fee v. Alten Hafen3.12011
    Joy KS v. Hege-Haus DK3.12011
    Gera v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern3.12011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg3.12011
    Quent v. Wittekind DK3.12011
    Bautz v. d. Leda3.12011
    Eddy v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Solojäger's Laura3.12011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde3.12011
    Aline KS v. Schwarzen Adler DK3.12011
    Dixi v. Wuddelhof3.12011
    Henk v. Huntetal3.12011
    Mirco v. Linduri3.12011
    Ando v. Birkengehege3.12011
    Ambra v. Struthof3.12011
    Uri v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Perro Nelha3.12011
    Nostra De Wynen3.12011
    Tina v. d. Bilsbek3.12011
    Birka v. d. Hirtenburg3.12011
    Fara v. Bussenhof3.12011
    Dixie v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Kira v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Gauner v. Stockey3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s