Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Amber v. Schloss Clemenswerth
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Amber v. Schloss Clemenswerth
    COI 5 gen: 1.562%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Anton v. d. Klosterwiese and Dam Cassy v. Hesterwede
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 1.172%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 2.344%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)58
    Ancestor Loss4
    Ancestor Loss in %93.55 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Anton v. d. Klosterwiese50.00011
    Cassy v. Hesterwede50.00011
    Hanno v. Lönsstein25.00011
    Bessy v. Loher Schwarten25.00011
    Arras v. Eschbach25.00011
    Dina v. d. Himmerner Heide25.00011
    Gera v. Lönsstein12.50011
    Gina v. Roonstein12.50011
    Arras v. Eikenloh12.50011
    Bautz v. d. Leda12.50011
    Lona v. Linduri12.50011
    Don v. Forst Ostenwalde12.50011
    Linda v. Fasanenhof12.50011
    Henry v. Forstgarten12.50011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp12.490312
    Hesta v. Linduri9.370211
    Olly v. Bärenhorst9.370211
    Cäsar v. Elsternkamp6.25011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Elko v. Huntetal6.25011
    Ilse v. Fasanenhof6.25011
    Graf v. Silbersee6.25011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Dina v. Forstgarten6.25011
    Gitta v. Lossetal6.25011
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide6.25011
    Lukas v. Linduri6.25011
    Bruna v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Freya v. Roonstein6.25011
    Lucie Nelha6.25011
    Flocke v. d. Tränke3.12011
    Paris v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Alo v. Burgstall3.12011
    Biene v. Siegbogen3.12011
    Laika v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Freya v. Steinroden3.12011
    Anett v. Fasanenhof3.12011
    Boss v. Silbersee3.12011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Cliff v. Linduri3.12011
    Solojäger's Granne3.12011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp3.12011
    Hektor v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel3.12011
    Dax v. d. Aue3.12011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land3.12011
    Jenny v. Huckberg3.12011
    Laura v. Poppenforst3.12011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen3.12011
    Dolly v. Lossetal3.12011
    Dandy v. Roonstein3.12011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek3.12011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Olga v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Cita v. Winterberg3.12011
    Orlo v. d. Overbecker Mühle3.12011
    Basko v. Bucheneck3.12011
    Joe v. Fasanenhof3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s